To: Nowhere Man
We need to keep the longwave ELF/VLF transmitters in place You've got a technical 'salad' of terms there that isn't very clear; a) they are phasing out the ELF system in favor of b) a VLF system with 12 different transmitting sites.
I've got to believe that the information 'data rate' will go up with the new system compared to the old system at ELF ...
25 posted on
09/26/2004 6:13:28 PM PDT by
_Jim
( <--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
To: _Jim
IIRC, the predecessor to this system was called Big Jim, which was a transmitter with its antenna stretched between two mountain tops. The data rate was woefully slow, but that was how we talked to submerged subs.
27 posted on
09/26/2004 6:20:57 PM PDT by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
To: _Jim
You've got a technical 'salad' of terms there that isn't very clear; a) they are phasing out the ELF system in favor of b) a VLF system with 12 different transmitting sites.
I've got to believe that the information 'data rate' will go up with the new system compared to the old system at ELF ...
Heh, I know, I drive people crazy with all those terms. B-) Will the new VLF sites be distributed all over the world? I remember a similar pan was used for the Omega navigation system, I think that's shut down now where they had 8 stations, 6 primary and 2 backup spaced around the world. IIRC, I think we had one in the Dakotas, another one was in India, and so on. I think they were on ELF in the 9 to 14 kc range.
Are you an amateur radio operator too? I'm KA3WRW. B-) BTW, I have some old QST's from 1963/64 that had an ad for a longwave radio where you can pick up Civil Defense and submarine communications too.
43 posted on
09/27/2004 5:14:53 PM PDT by
Nowhere Man
("Laws are the spider webs through which the big bugs fly past and the little ones get caught.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson