Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Syria brokers secret deal to send atomic weapons scientists to Iran (BIG RED ALERT)
The Sunday Telegraph ^ | September 26, 2004 | Con Coughlin

Posted on 09/25/2004 4:56:27 PM PDT by MadIvan

Syria's President Bashir al-Asad is in secret negotiations with Iran to secure a safe haven for a group of Iraqi nuclear scientists who were sent to Damascus before last year's war to overthrow Saddam Hussein.

Western intelligence officials believe that President Asad is desperate to get the Iraqi scientists out of his country before their presence prompts America to target Syria as part of the war on terrorism.

The issue of moving the Iraqi scientists to Iran was raised when President Asad made a visit to Teheran in July. Intelligence officials understand that the Iranians have still to respond to the Syrian leader's request.

A group of about 12 middle-ranking Iraqi nuclear technicians and their families were transported to Syria before the collapse of Saddam's regime. The transfer was arranged under a combined operation by Saddam's now defunct Special Security Organisation and Syrian Military Security, which is headed by Arif Shawqat, the Syrian president's brother-in-law.

The Iraqis, who brought with them CDs crammed with research data on Saddam's nuclear programme, were given new identities, including Syrian citizenship papers and falsified birth, education and health certificates. Since then they have been hidden away at a secret Syrian military installation where they have been conducting research on behalf of their hosts.

Growing political concern in Washington about Syria's undeclared weapons of mass destruction programmes, however, has prompted President Asad to reconsider harbouring the Iraqis.

American intelligence officials are concerned that Syria is secretly working on a number of WMD programmes.

They have also uncovered evidence that Damascus has acquired a number of gas centrifuges - probably from North Korea - that can be used to enrich uranium for a nuclear bomb.

Relations between Washington and Damascus have been strained since last year's war in Iraq, with American commanders accusing the Syrians of allowing foreign fighters to cross the border into Iraq, where they carry out terrorist attacks against coalition forces.

"The Syrians are playing a very dangerous game," a senior Western intelligence official told The Sunday Telegraph.

"The Americans already have them in their sights because they are doing next to nothing to stop foreign fighters entering Iraq. If Washington finds concrete evidence that Syria is engaged in an illegal WMD programme then it will quickly find itself targeted as part of the war on terror."

Under the terms of the deal President Asad offered the Iranians, the Iraqi scientists and their families would be transferred to Teheran together with a small amount of essential materials. The Iraqi team would then assist Iranian scientists to develop a nuclear weapon.

Apart from paying the relocation expenses, President Asad also wants the Iranians to agree to share the results of their atomic weapons research with Damascus.

The Syrian offer comes at a time when Iran is under close scrutiny from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which is investigating claims that Iran is maintaining a secret nuclear bomb programme.

The Iranians, who possess one of the world's largest oil reserves, insist that their nuclear programme is aimed solely at developing nuclear energy. Last week relations between Teheran and the IAEA deteriorated further after the Iranians reneged on a commitment to suspend their nuclear programme.

In a move that will raise suspicions in Washington that Iran is trying to build an atomic bomb, Teheran announced that it was to press ahead with plans to enrich 37 tons of uranium into the gas needed to turn the radioactive element into nuclear fuel. Nuclear experts estimate that when the process is complete the Iranians will have enough enriched uranium for five nuclear bombs.

The IAEA responded by passing a resolution setting a November 25 deadline for Iran to clear up suspicions over its nuclear activities or risk having the issue referred to the United Nations Security Council for possible sanctions. The resolution also demanded that Iran halt all activities related to uranium enrichment, a part of the nuclear fuel cycle that can be used for both energy and weapons purposes.

In a further gesture of defiance, Ali Shamkhani, the Iranian defence minister, announced that the Iranian army has taken delivery of a new "strategic missile".

The missile, unnamed for security reasons, was successfully tested last week, Shamkhani was quoted as saying by state television. It was unclear if the weapon in question was the Shahab-3 medium-range missile, acquired by the Revolutionary Guards in July last year. An improved version was successfully tested in August.

The Shahab-3 is based on a North Korean design and is thought to be capable of carrying a one-ton warhead at least 800 miles, which puts Israel well within its range.

The Iranians yesterday also accused America of "lawless militarism" in Iraq and called Israel the biggest threat to peace in the Middle East. "The attack against Iraq was illegal," Kamal Kharrazi, Iran's foreign minister told the UN General Assembly. He thanked Kofi Annan, the UN secretary-general, for stating the same in a television interview last week.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axisofevil; iran; napalminthemorning; nukes; proliferation; southwestasia; syria; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Gucho
Wait a minute. Kerry said he has a better plan for fighting terror :)

He does. He is going to plead with the French, to get them to plead with the UN, to get them to plead with Syria, to pretty please stop supporting terrorism, or else they will do absolutely nothing about it (because they can't).

41 posted on 09/25/2004 7:02:31 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (CBS's story is sinking faster than Uncle Ted's Oldsmobile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

We just sold Israel some 500 bunker buster bombs...


Hopefully Israel uses the FIFO accounting principle for inventory control:
First In - First Out!


42 posted on 09/25/2004 7:21:59 PM PDT by bear11 ("In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The attack against Iran will be illegal too - and lethal. Cry us a river, nutjobs, your time is fast approaching.
43 posted on 09/25/2004 8:01:15 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

10-4!!!


44 posted on 09/25/2004 8:08:43 PM PDT by the conservative bean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot

Having had some close association with this group of people, the North Koreans, I could never predict what or how they will react. Thank God there is a God to provide that sane sense of reality to situations such as this.


45 posted on 09/25/2004 9:01:18 PM PDT by Joee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Joee
NK comment is interesting. I do not think we will hit NK yet. But JAPAN is starting to rattle a saber and the SKs too. I do not think anything will intimidate NK more than a Samurai sword!
46 posted on 09/25/2004 9:14:02 PM PDT by Henchman (Kerry lied, good men died!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I've said for quite some time that we shouldn't have stopped short at Iraq's borders. The Syrians and the Iranians need to be gelded. Take out their armed forces and any military infrastructure, force free elections down their throats at gunpoint. Worked for Germany and Japan, working in Iraq, gonna work there too.


47 posted on 09/25/2004 11:03:46 PM PDT by Ostlandr (Nationalist, small-r republican, fiscal conservative, social liberal, pagan. NOT a Bush partisan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

It's not secret anymore.


48 posted on 09/25/2004 11:05:33 PM PDT by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Maybe this is why we just sold a bunch of bunker buster bombs to Israel ..??


49 posted on 09/25/2004 11:13:18 PM PDT by CyberAnt (Sen.Miller said, "Bush is a God-fearing man with a good heart and a spine of tempered steel")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

"Yes, and Russia recently voted against telling Syria to get its tens of thousands of troops out of Lebanon."

Despite my srong feelings of regret for those children targeted in Beslan, the Russians are NOT our friends.


50 posted on 09/25/2004 11:28:17 PM PDT by iThinkBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TwoWolves

"North Korea may just be waiting for us to spread ourselves too thin in the Middle East, before they decide to take South Korea and Japan."

South Korea, probably - but take Japan? How the hell would they do that?


51 posted on 09/25/2004 11:30:09 PM PDT by iThinkBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: iThinkBig

Did you not see the post the other day, where they threatened to make Japan a sea of nuclear fire?


52 posted on 09/25/2004 11:49:17 PM PDT by TwoWolves (The only kind of control the liberals don't want is self control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: QuodErat
Ironically Syria is a stablizing force in Lebanon. Lebanon is filled with homebrew crazies and the only thing they are afraid of is Syrian brutality.

Thanks to Arafat slaughtering 100,000 Christian Lebanese. Not much left of the Rivera of the Middle East now.

53 posted on 09/25/2004 11:58:56 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: iThinkBig
"South Korea, probably - but take Japan? How the hell would they do that?"

Why, it would be all of the broken junk falling on Japan after its ATBM systems shot down all of N. Korea's missiles. ...or maybe the bio-hazards (putrescine, botulinum, etc.) that would fill the air from North Korea afterward.

[Little silliness there on my part.]
54 posted on 09/26/2004 12:50:40 AM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Well hello...anyone with half a brain tied behind his back could understand what Saddam did with his WMD. He gave his airplanes to an enemy in GWI...why would he not give his WMD to one of his evil running buddies?


55 posted on 09/26/2004 6:37:03 AM PDT by RVN Airplane Driver (www.RealHeroesVoices.com....see the real John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Axiom Nine

ping


56 posted on 09/26/2004 6:39:53 AM PDT by pax_et_bonum (Sometimes these brain cells have a mind of their own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

"Syria and Iran have gone too far this time. Come on, Mr. President, come on, Prime Minister - this is not on.
Regards, Ivan"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Spot on, Ivan!!!!!!!!! You tell them.


57 posted on 09/26/2004 6:42:00 AM PDT by LakeLady (Terrorists, Kerry, DemonRats...ZOT 'em all! It's their only chance to leave in a blaze of glory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Axiom Nine

ping


58 posted on 09/26/2004 8:08:24 AM PDT by pax_et_bonum (Sometimes these brain cells have a mind of their own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop
We will soon crush the deceitful, evil rulers of Iran and Syria. And allies of those countries will shut up and watch the show, if they know what's good for them. So will the former US traitors--remnants of SDS, other communists, paleo-Nazis, all.

Putin too.

59 posted on 09/26/2004 8:30:26 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Ahmmmm, there were no WMD.... there were no WMD... there were no WMD....


60 posted on 09/26/2004 8:49:03 AM PDT by mtbopfuyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson