Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Chicoms learn quickly.
The Germans build 'em a Maglev, then the Chicoms turn around to squeeze 'em out of the market.
Of course, they're gonna backstab us the same way: aquire our technology, then ditch us.

Chip: from China-made to China-created
China Showcases Space Program
Westinghouse nuclear plant design OK'd (for China, not U.S.A.)
China overtakes United States as top destination for foreign investment

1 posted on 09/25/2004 1:03:50 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Willie Green
China made it to develop MAS-3 maglev train with its own intellectual property rights.

PRC Code for "We stole it from those filthy decadent capitalist pigs..."

2 posted on 09/25/2004 1:06:01 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (How do you ask a hamster to be the last hamster to die for a mistake?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
The train, 2.63 meters long and 1.25 meters wide, can hold six people.

This is a long way from commercially ready.

1.25 meters is not even wide enough for two adults to sit comfortably side by side.

In ten years the Chinese may get this on the market. And by then their train will likely have been eclipsed by a better product from a capitalist country.

3 posted on 09/25/2004 1:19:44 PM PDT by Pontiac (Ignorance of the law is no excuse, ignorance of your rights can be fatal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green

Maglev is 'brand-new'? That'll be news to those who developed it decades ago.


4 posted on 09/25/2004 1:51:01 PM PDT by WOSG (George W Bush / Dick Cheney - Right for our Times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green

6 people per car???


6 posted on 09/25/2004 2:25:39 PM PDT by Old Professer (The Truth always gets lost in the Noise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
A conventional train on a track moves forward by means of friction. If the maglev train reduces the friction between the train and the track, what accelerates the train forward?
7 posted on 09/25/2004 2:35:10 PM PDT by stripes1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
Will this technology actually make the trains and tracks less expensive? Isn't the biggest economic problem with rail travel the expense of builing and maintaining the rails? If this technology could reduce that cost, then it might be viable. I can't see it being viable if it can't reduce that cost.

Bill

13 posted on 09/25/2004 5:53:26 PM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson