Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JulieRNR21

Can he get in trouble for that?


2 posted on 09/25/2004 9:57:28 AM PDT by madison46 (Bandwagon was full when it left the gate - I hope it remains too full for frogs & co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: madison46

Probably a section decision.
I'd say the whole squad was in on it.


3 posted on 09/25/2004 9:58:30 AM PDT by Darksheare (Liberalism is political domestic abuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: madison46

not in a combat zone....


6 posted on 09/25/2004 9:58:57 AM PDT by dwilli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: madison46
Only If kerry is CIC.
7 posted on 09/25/2004 9:58:57 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Rather calls Saddam "Mister President" and calls President Bush "bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: madison46
Can he get in trouble for that?

For supporting the Commander in Chief? Bring it on!

8 posted on 09/25/2004 9:59:44 AM PDT by Mister Baredog ((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: madison46

DoD Employees, Servicemembers Need to Heed Hatch Act Rules
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Sept. 21, 2004 -- As the election season swings into high gear, the Office of Special Counsel has filed complaints against two federal employees deemed in violation of the Hatch Act.

The complaints address the use of "politically partisan electronic mail messages while on duty," according to a statement released by the OSC.

The Hatch Act regulates DoD employees' and servicemembers' participation in politics. The recent violations focus on e-mails sent to about 15 recipients in one case and more than 70 in the other.

"The use of Internet and electronic mail is second-nature to almost everyone and has become a favorite and effective campaign tool, even more so perhaps than four years ago," Special Counsel Scott Bloch said in the statement. "I want to remind federal employees to be vigilant about following the Hatch Act, because we will consider this activity a form of electronic leafleting and thus a violation of the prohibition on partisan political activity in the workplace."

Partisan political activity is defined as activity directed toward the success or failure of a political party or candidate for a partisan political office or partisan political group.

Participation in politics is not completely forbidden. However, active-duty military and executive-branch employees need to be aware of the rights and restrictions that the Hatch Act imposes on such activity. What is allowed and disallowed can be a bit confusing.

Of DoD employees, those in uniform are under the most restrictions. They may attend political meetings or rallies, but only as spectators and not in uniform. They are not allowed to give political speeches, serve in any official capacity in partisan groups or participate in political campaigns or conventions.

They are also not generally allowed to campaign for political office.

In its essence, the Hatch Act prohibits federal executive-branch employees from engaging in political activity while on duty or wearing an official uniform, the statement said.

Related Sites:
Hatch Act for Federal Employees
DoD Directive on Political Activities by Members of the Armed Forces
Political Do's and Don'ts Under the Hatch Act


Rules Restrict Political Activity for DoD People






12 posted on 09/25/2004 10:01:38 AM PDT by boxerblues (www.ohbluestarmothers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: madison46

I don't think so. The way I understand it- he could get in trouble for CRITICIZING the CIC. No problem speaking positivley about him.


16 posted on 09/25/2004 10:04:41 AM PDT by getitright (This tagline is accurate but not authentic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: madison46

He could have at one time.


20 posted on 09/25/2004 10:07:46 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: madison46
Can he get in trouble for that?

Yes. It's against military rules and regs to actively campaign, while on duty, for any party or person.

25 posted on 09/25/2004 10:11:27 AM PDT by mfulstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: madison46

Caption 1: "Try keying this vehicle"

Caption 2: "No sir, nobody has tried to steal it yet"

Caption 3: "this is the kind of armor I like"

Caption 4: "GW is my co-pilot"


45 posted on 09/25/2004 10:59:48 AM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: madison46
Can he get in trouble for that?

He's just supporting his Commander in Chief.
46 posted on 09/25/2004 10:59:49 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: madison46
Can he get in trouble for that?+++++++++++++

Only if someone complains and he admits to putting the sticker there. Ofcourse, the entire company will swear that a mad Iraqi ran up and put the sticker on the LAV and the Co has sand in his eyes and can't see.

64 posted on 09/25/2004 12:06:30 PM PDT by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson