Posted on 09/24/2004 10:17:55 PM PDT by OldBlondBabe
rent your home out to a pack of about 30 illegal aliens at, oh let's say $500/mo (cash only of course). That will give you about a 150% return per year on your 300K house so you'll be able to afford to live in a more exclusive neighborhood with your new cash cow
So what is your solution? Shall we incarcerate or kill them all and let "God sort 'em out"?
Yes, people do slip through cracks in the system. Some people have relapses. That's why responsible, loving parents were created - to help prepare their children for bad stuff that can happen.
Take some personal responsibility in this matter.
As for the rest of the residents, I understand you would be uncomfortable. So often those running these homes, either for lack of money or concern, aren't operating them with even the residents safety in mind, let alone the rest of the neighborhood. Since the mayor is in such close proximity I think I'd burden him with some of your concerns, hopefully he will have information that might help you put your mind at ease.
The post spoke in terms of highly to moderately trainable adults. One of the things we learned is to be very careful of language. There is a group home in our neighborhood for Down's Syndrome folks and it blends in well and generally makes good neighbors. However, the reason I suggested FOIA the state for the license is to determine the real population it is serving -- don't rely on what its advocates are telling you.
I prefer bidding wars anyway.
There's always eBay. (P.S. Welcome, or welcome back - whatever the case may be.)
good luck with this. i put the safety of girls above everything else, but local governments have different values and priorities.
so far, none of my daughers have been victimized, but i see training them about predators as an ongoing process.
as a psychologist, i have worked both with sexual victims and sexual offenders. the serious offenders don't really get better, and they are all over the place (in schools, churches, etc.) so the only solution is training girls in terms of spotting predators and making quick escapes.
unfortunately, this still leaves the untrained girls as victims, but i haven't found any solution to this. the probation department here is very good, but eventually the offenders get off probation (or out of prison).
Here's an expanation of this guy's conviction. We're talking about rape of a child.
3rd Degree: includes Penetration plus either circumstance 11, 12, 13
Penalty: Felony; up to 15 years in prison
11. Victim 13, 14, 15 years old
12. Victims Incapacity
13. Force or Coercion
a. Actual Application
b. Threats
c. Extortion
d. Medical Treatment
e. Element of Surprise
Does God love these people too?
What is causing you to judge otherwise?
BTW, all you have is a description of a class 3 felony - not his specific charges. Go ask.
Mossberg - 500 series
ENROLL YOUR KIDS IN SOME SELF-DEFENSE CLASSES..
While it's a good idea to avoid trouble, and when possible, leave the area, (run away) sometimes that option is not available..
When circumstances place you (or your 13 year-old daughter) in a situation where "escape" is not possible, curling up into a fetal position will not solve the problem..
SUBMISSION IS NOT AN ANSWER, AND WILL NOT SAVE YOU FROM HARM..
Have your daughter trained to defend herself..
She may have to save her own life someday...
Excellent idea. Thank you for reinforcing the personal responsibility aspect.
Our neighborhood is restricted, so it's not a good comparison. I would think that residential zoning would prohibit such a place unless they had it rezoned. To do so, they'd have to send letters out to the locals (such as yourself) and invite you to a meeting on the subject.
A 13 yr. old may not be able to carry legally, but could still go to the range and become proficient in the use of..
Far as I know, intruders are still fair game..
I was angry at first blush regarding your post. I DO
consider you to be a NIMBY.
People having mental retardation/ developmental disabities do not typically assault those who live in the neighborhood.
I erased my first post as it may have been TOO angry.
I suggest that it may behoove you, before posting, to accurately check your facts, rather than to rely upon neighborhood innuendo and gossip:
Is it a group home for people with developmental disabilities? Is it a group home for those from the correction's system? Is it a group home for those with sexual offenses making their way back into society?
There is quite a difference, and the stigma of your post perpetuates the 'mixing' of myths regarding 'disorders'
MAYBE if you would VISIT the group home being discussed in the neighborhood, you would be able to discern the truth of your own accord,before asking those without any direct knowledge whatsoever,their opinions.
Flame away.
Pedophiles rarely recover, and most will repeat and repeat. I work in Mental Health Forensics, and I know the rates, believe me, they are the original revolving door types, exhibiting good behaviors on the inside and going out to prey on your children when out.
I feel that for the price of a home and the property taxes, someone should not have one of these homes in their neighborhood especially if it was put there without a proper community hearing or notification of the existing homeowners. Do every thing outlined in that one post to get these homes out of your area. Eventually they may evolve to taking violent penal code patients. I don't know about the laws in your states, but it has happened here in California.
As far as opening the State Hospitals, that's where they once were housed before the new Liberal Mental Health Dogma of the 60's and 70's, before the same liberal types decided hey should be mainstreamed in the community. In the last 30 years these programs have been proven failures but the feel-good types in the Mental Health field won't relinquish their power, and it keep lots more people employed with your tax money.
May 15, 1995 - CITY OF EDMONDS, PETITIONER v. OXFORD HOUSE, INC., et al.
Really, you are a forensic mental health care worker? Then you must be familiar with the following paper:
THE PARAPHILIAS, OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE SPECTRUM DISORDER, AND THE TREATMENT OF SEXUALLY DEVIANT BEHAVIORS
J. M. W. Bradford is Clinical Director, Forensic Program, The Royal Hospital; Director of Sexual Behaviours Clinic; Professor of Psychiatry Division of Forensic Psychiatry, The University of Ottawa.
Snip: "The recidivism rate of pedophiles is often exaggerated in order to support a punitive approach, and the media misrepresents the problem by the sensational reporting of child murder cases."
I would suggest reading this entire paper. Perhaps you may pick up a few facts along the way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.