Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush, Kerry, but not Nader, Invited to Debates
FoxNews ^

Posted on 09/24/2004 8:23:20 PM PDT by Happy2BMe

The Commission on Presidential Debates asked President Bush (search) and Democratic Sen. John Kerry (search) to meet for their first debate next week. The commission also invited Vice President Dick Cheney and Sen. John Edwards to a single debate on Oct. 5.

Invitations were based on nonpartisan selection criteria adopted last year: that participants be constitutionally eligible for election; that their names appear on enough state ballots to have a mathematical chance of winning enough electoral votes for election; and that they receive at least 15 percent in an average of five national polls to show support for election.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; debates; kerry; nader; presiden; presidentialdebates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
"In a statement, the commission said no other candidates besides Bush and Kerry met all the criteria."
1 posted on 09/24/2004 8:23:20 PM PDT by Happy2BMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP; PhilDragoo; dennisw; Salem; Smartass; potlatch; JohnHuang2; Mia T

Presidential debates - ping.


2 posted on 09/24/2004 8:24:29 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (Just 39 more days until November 2nd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

This is an outrage! Mr. Nader needs more national level coverage to help peel off votes from, er, to have his views heard by the underrepresented far left wing.


3 posted on 09/24/2004 8:27:20 PM PDT by Steel Wolf (Don't make me roll initiative...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

I'll bet Pat Buchanan is seething...


4 posted on 09/24/2004 8:28:51 PM PDT by ErnBatavia ("Dork"; a 60's term for a 60's kinda guy: JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf

That's right ...
I agree.


5 posted on 09/24/2004 8:31:22 PM PDT by jebanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf

The polls show that Nader isn't really helping Bush at all. He is a waste of time.


6 posted on 09/24/2004 8:38:47 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

.......and that they receive at least 15 percent in an average of five national polls to show support for election........

Why does a low "polling" trump a candidate from a debate, if he is constitutional elligable, and is registered in enough states to win the election?


7 posted on 09/24/2004 8:40:21 PM PDT by duk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
NADER NOT INVITED...It's a DemoRat plot.
This is outrageous.   How else can there be a fair election?

8 posted on 09/24/2004 8:40:56 PM PDT by Smartass (BUSH & CHENEY 2004 Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smartass
"How else can there be a fair election?"

Why don't we ask Dan Rather?

9 posted on 09/24/2004 8:42:08 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (Just 39 more days until November 2nd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Torie
The polls show that Nader isn't really helping Bush at all. He is a waste of time.

(diabolical plotting voice) Yesss, and since he's not helping Bush, it could't hurt to have him at the debates. That's what we'll tell them. Yesss....

10 posted on 09/24/2004 8:42:45 PM PDT by Steel Wolf (Don't make me roll initiative...!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

They should put Kerry in an echo chamber and let him debate himself.


11 posted on 09/24/2004 8:44:35 PM PDT by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

DNC / RNC
Partners in subversive activities
Partners in stifling Freedom of Speech
Partners in lining their own pockets and to HELL with Americans

Partners in total COWARDICE - they are afraid of NADER - they were afraid of PEROT - they are NOT afraid of YOU!

YOU had best be afraid of THEM!


12 posted on 09/24/2004 8:46:35 PM PDT by steplock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie

"The polls show that Nader isn't really helping Bush at all. He is a waste of time."

So you say that Americans FREEDOM of choice is totally irrelavant? A waste of time?

This country is all but gone as a nation of free thinking, self reliant, moral people - it's a shame - R. I. P.


13 posted on 09/24/2004 8:48:42 PM PDT by steplock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

I take this as a personal insult to Flipper.
AND ALL AIR-HEADS!!!


14 posted on 09/24/2004 8:48:57 PM PDT by alcuin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steplock; Steel Wolf; Smartass; All
Commission on Presidential Debates Provides Update on Debate Planning

Commission on Presidential Debates Provides Update on Debate Planning

September 21, 2004

The Commission on Presidential Debates ("the Commission") is pleased that the Bush and Kerry campaigns have committed to the series of three presidential debates and one vice presidential debate, including the locations, dates, times, moderators and 90-minute lengths, as proposed by the Commission. The first presidential debate will be held at the University of Miami on September 30, 2004.

Invitations to candidates to participate in the debates will be extended based on the application of the Commission's Non-Partisan Candidate Selection Criteria, adopted in September 2003. As planned, those Criteria will be applied on September 24, 2004 to determine candidate participation in the September 30, 2004 presidential debate and the October 5, 2004 vice presidential debate. After the application of its Criteria, the Commission will be pleased to finalize with the invited candidates debate ground rules and other technical matters. The Commission will be guided by its goal of providing the American people with informative debates in which the candidates address the critical issues facing the country.

In the meantime, the Commission is proceeding with the preparations for each of the scheduled debates. The full schedule of debates is as follows:

First presidential debate:
University of Miami
Coral Gables, FL
Thursday, September 30
Jim Lehrer
Anchor and Executive Editor, The NewsHour, PBS

Vice presidential debate:
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, OH
Tuesday, October 5
Gwen Ifill
Senior Correspondent, The NewsHour, and Moderator, Washington Week, PBS

Second presidential debate:
Washington University in St. Louis
St. Louis, MO
Friday, October 8
Charles Gibson
Co-Anchor, ABC News Good Morning America

Third presidential debate:
Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ
Wednesday, October 13
Bob Schieffer
CBS News Chief Washington Correspondent, and Moderator, Face the Nation

Each debate shall begin at 9:00 p.m. EDT.


15 posted on 09/24/2004 8:50:29 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (Just 39 more days until November 2nd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steplock

I am sure you have a point. I just don't know what it is. My point was that Bush relying on the Nader card is unwise, because Nader isn't going to help Bush, because the polls show the margin is about the same, sometimes even more pro Bush, with him excluded. What's yours?


16 posted on 09/24/2004 8:54:40 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Thanks for the schedule happy...


17 posted on 09/24/2004 8:55:46 PM PDT by Smartass (BUSH & CHENEY 2004 Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: steplock

With all due respect, the Dems were not afraid of Perot in any way whatsoever. He ran to insure Bill Clinton's election.

But you are correct about Nader. They are deathly afraid of anyone who might siphon votes from the anti-Bush.


18 posted on 09/24/2004 8:56:25 PM PDT by newheart (The Truth? You can't handle the Truth. But He can handle you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steplock

Why don't the other candidates/parties get together and conduct their own debate[s] as they see fit to do so under any rules they chose to implement?...... Nothing says they can't or that they must be included in these..... unless you want to mandate by some fiat that they be included


19 posted on 09/24/2004 9:06:42 PM PDT by deport ("Because we believe in human dignity..." [President Bush at the UN])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Why don't we ask Dan Rather?

Bob Schieffer of CBS Face the Nation of Liberals will be the moderator for the Oct 13th debate. There is not much difference between DNC Dan and Bush Bashing Bob. Under the circumstances, CBS should not be participating.
20 posted on 09/24/2004 9:30:44 PM PDT by etradervic (If Kerry is the answer, what was the question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson