Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Florida Failed to Defend the Life of Terri Schiavo
Zenit News Agency ^ | September 24, 2004

Posted on 09/24/2004 4:00:36 PM PDT by NYer

Bioethicist Comments on State Supreme Court’s Ruling

ROME/TALLAHASSEE, Florida, SEPT. 24, 2004 (Zenit.org).- A bioethicist expressed his concern over the failure of the Florida State Supreme Court to defend the life of Terri Schiavo in face of her husband's insistence that she be allowed to die.

The Court ruled on Thursday that the "Terri Law", signed by Florida's Governor Jeb Bush, is unconstitutional and that the governor should not have been given the power to have the feeding tube reinserted, against the wishes of the brain-damaged woman's husband. Terri Shiavo has been unconscious for the past 14 years.

The Court heard the appeal of Michael Schiavo, the patient's husband, and ruled that the law, approved by the Florida State Legislature and in force for only 15 days, is unconstitutional.

The seven judges of the State Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the "Terri Law," promulgated in October of 2003, violated the separation of the powers between the judicial, legislative and executive branch, and that the Florida Legislature improperly delegated power to the governor.

"We recognize that the tragic circumstances underlying this case make it difficult to put emotions aside and focus solely on the legal issue presented," wrote Chief Justice Barbara Pariente, who authored the opinion.

"We are not insensitive to the struggle that all members of Theresa's family have endured since she fell unconscious in 1990. However, we are a nation of laws and we must govern our decisions by the rule of law and not by our own emotions," she continued.

"Our hearts can fully comprehend the grief so fully demonstrated by Theresa's family members on this record," the ruling said. "But our hearts are not the law. What is in the Constitution always must prevail over emotions. Our oaths as judges require that this principle is our polestar, and it alone."

Terri Schiavo, 40, suffered severe brain damage in 1990 when her heart stopped due to an eating problem. Although she can breathe on her own, she needs a feeding tube to survive. Her husband argues that she would not have wished to be kept alive in this way and wants the tube to be removed and that she be allowed to die.

However, the patient's parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, rejected the proposal and alleged that their daughter might recover her faculties.

“I cannot go into the technical aspects of the ruling. I don't know if it is correct from the strictly technical-juridical point of view. However, it is very sad and worrying that a defenseless person's death can be caused by a technical problem and that the juridical system is unable to protect Terri Schiavo's life," said Father Gonzalo Miranda, dean of the Faculty of Bioethics of Rome's Pontifical Athenaeum Regina Apostolorum.

"Assuming that the ruling is technically correct, I think that the position presented by Judge Barbara Pariente, is gravely inexact: the problem does not lie in choosing between 'emotions and rules,' but between defense of a human life and the rules," the Legionary of Christ said in statements to ZENIT.

"Obviously the written rules cannot address each and all of the concrete cases that can arise. Interpretation of the rules not only is necessary but inevitable," added the expert, who has represented the Catholic Church in questions of bioethics at UNESCO.

"And, in the case of a serious emergency, as was Mrs. Schiavo's situation when 'Terri's Law' was promulgated, one would have to be able to interpret and apply the rules in favor of the protection of life, perhaps with an all together exceptional and temporal legal measure (so that it could not be used abusively as a precedent to alter the established juridical and constitutional order)."

"When an emergency arises and the written rules are not adequate to protect someone who is in danger of death, are we not able to adapt the rules or interpret them keeping the special situation in mind, or to make an exception for the good of the person?" Father Miranda asked.

"What will happen when a terrorist threatens someone's life and the rules do not allow his arrest?" he continued.

“I am assailed by a suspicion: the sad Schiavo case has been extended for a very long time, without the lawmakers and judges being able to definitively guarantee the protection of life."

"Might it not be the case, in fact, that some would prefer to see her dead?" he asked.

"King Solomon knew who the real mother of the child was when he saw that one of the women accepted his being cut in half, while the mother cried out that she preferred that he be given alive to the other woman," Father Miranda added.

"Terri's husband pursues obsessively his wife's death (alleging, naturally, that he does so out of compassion for her). Terry's parents are fighting to save her life. If only our judges would learn something of the wisdom of Solomon," he concluded.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: bioethics; flsupremecourt; flsupremes; righttolife; schiavo; schindler; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 09/24/2004 4:00:39 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: luv2lurkhere; Budge; floriduh voter; summer; Coleus; amom; ruoflaw; submarine; cpforlife.org; ...
I think that the position presented by Judge Barbara Pariente, is gravely inexact: the problem does not lie in choosing between 'emotions and rules,' but between defense of a human life and the rules,"


2 posted on 09/24/2004 4:02:40 PM PDT by NYer (When you have done something good, remember the words "without Me you can do nothing." (John 15:5).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Is it possible for the parents to move her to a new state that would protect her?


3 posted on 09/24/2004 4:03:28 PM PDT by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue; Canticle_of_Deborah; MarMema; kimmie7; floriduh voter; JulieRNR21; NautiNurse; ...

Terri's Ping


4 posted on 09/24/2004 4:03:54 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: american colleen; sinkspur; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; ...
"Terri's husband pursues obsessively his wife's death (alleging, naturally, that he does so out of compassion for her). Terry's parents are fighting to save her life. If only our judges would learn something of the wisdom of Solomon," he concluded.

Catholic Ping - let me know if you want on/off this list


5 posted on 09/24/2004 4:05:18 PM PDT by NYer (When you have done something good, remember the words "without Me you can do nothing." (John 15:5).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trashcanbred

No, he is her guardian. Her parents cannot even visit her without his permission.


6 posted on 09/24/2004 4:12:56 PM PDT by Jersey Republican Biker Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org; Mr. Silverback; scripter

Ping!


7 posted on 09/24/2004 4:14:12 PM PDT by NYer (When you have done something good, remember the words "without Me you can do nothing." (John 15:5).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick
Um... who said anything about it being legal for them to do it? Anyway I would imagine that would be a very hard thing for them to do.
8 posted on 09/24/2004 4:19:52 PM PDT by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

He is so disgusting. Why doesn't he just leave her alone and let her parents care for her. Can't he just divorce her, must he kill her? This is just so sick.


9 posted on 09/24/2004 4:26:31 PM PDT by pepperdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pepperdog
I wish I knew. Money maybe? No one knows how much is left from the lawsuit that he was awarded to pay for her care.
10 posted on 09/24/2004 4:28:55 PM PDT by Jersey Republican Biker Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick; pepperdog

Money maybe, or quite possibly he doesn't want there to be any chance, even the remotest, that she might recover to the point of some sort of communication. (I think he caused her 'accident'.)


11 posted on 09/24/2004 4:33:12 PM PDT by kenth (Tucking tail and running is not an exit strategy, it's cowardice and surrender.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: trashcanbred
re: "Is it possible for the parents to move her to a new state that would protect her?"

They aren't even allowed to visit her most of the time. The husband has complete and total control over her and usually makes it very difficult for anyone from her family to visit.

It is my fervent prayer that there will be a very special place in hell for this man. This poor lady doesn't even get her teeth brushed thanks to him. She has NEVER been given even the most rudimentary physical therapy to prevent her muscles and joints from deteriorating and he's never allowed the family to provide therapy to see if she has any potential for rehab. Meanwhile, the husband has moved on with his life, including a girl friend and a child with her.
12 posted on 09/24/2004 4:38:04 PM PDT by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick
re: "No one knows how much is left "

Every one involved in the case stresses that this is not a matter of money. There is something else going on. One theory is that she didn't end up in her present state by accident and that is she ever wakes up she will tell the real story. I find that idea pretty far fetched, but who knows what sort of reasoning a man like this might come up with.
13 posted on 09/24/2004 4:42:55 PM PDT by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pepperdog; Jersey Republican Biker Chick; NYer

<< He is so disgusting .... must he kill her? >>

Apparently, once he begins a task, he sticks to it 'till it's done.


14 posted on 09/24/2004 4:43:28 PM PDT by Brian Allen (I am, thank God, a hyphenated American: An AMERICAN-American - AND a Dollar-a-Day FReeper-2XBlessed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kenth
My suspicion is this: that the husband knows that whenever she dies, there will be at least a book and most probably a movie that will reap him untold monies. Not only has he a girlfriend, but TWO children with that woman. He is still legally married to Terry, and I think the parents made a big mistake in not trying to get her divorced, somehow, from this monster many years ago.

Without some divine intervention, in some untold and fantastic manner, I fear that this will have a very bad ending.

15 posted on 09/24/2004 4:46:53 PM PDT by tenthirteen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: nickcarraway
Republicans in Florida have actively participated in the failure to defend Terri's Life. They ordered her death. They laugh it off at the local GOP headquarters. They say they are pro-life while saying that it was Terri's wishes and that Greer followed the rule of law. INTERESTING HOW THE GOP HAS GREER'S TALKING POINTS. How high up does this collusion go? Jeb may be the emperor with no clothes just trying to fight off the hurricanes. He sounds like he's going to throw in the towel.

PRO-LIFE REPUBLICAN IS AN OXYMORON IN PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA.

17 posted on 09/24/2004 5:10:43 PM PDT by floriduh voter (www.conservative-spirit.org NATIONAL & FLORIDA ISSUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: civil discourse

"It is also inexact to say she should be "allowed to die."

It would be more correct to say she would be "left to die."


Both are wrong - because she is NOT dying. For her to die, she has to be killed, which is what her husband is trying to do.

"He is still legally married to Terry, and I think the parents made a big mistake in not trying to get her divorced, somehow, from this monster many years ago."

They tried, but her demon husband refuses. HOW in the world is someone allowed to have so much control over someone else, where he even orders that she not have her teeth brushed. You're right - he IS a monster. Oh, and she is NOT unconscious - she is brain-damaged. Alert, awake, responsive, but, brain-damaged.


18 posted on 09/24/2004 5:12:45 PM PDT by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NYer

This is judicial activism gone amuck. You silly legislative body you can't go passing laws to govern the state, the court can decide whatever it wants and you are powerless to do otherwise. na na na ( FL Courts to Judiciary and Administrative branch ).

Further I saw an article today about this being about "A womans right to die". Horsespit. Its about a mans right to kill his wife, slowly and painfully.

If Jeb doesn't put the state police in the hospital to enforce his order ignoring the courts then I will know the republic is in serious jeapordy.


19 posted on 09/24/2004 5:16:39 PM PDT by festus (Proud and Practicing Member of the Pajama Posse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: civil discourse
The evil irony and horror is that Terri does not want to die. She experiences joy and has a sense of humor. Feeding tubes were invented in the 1860s and they are a tube in the stomach, not in the nose and it is run by gravity, not by any fancy life support mechanism.

Failing to defend Terri: The media purposely has also failed Terri. They've been AGAINST HER. What would we do without the internet where the truth is getting out.

If anyone wants to help, there are two vital steps to get involved. Email fight4terri@aol.com and subscribe at www.terrisfight.org. THE TIME IS NOW TO GET ON BOARD. Florida failed Terri but Floridians with help from many other places aren't abandoning Terri or her lovely family. We don't know what's going to happen but we welcome everyone to join us.

FINALLY, it must be said that REPUBLICANS ARE THE ONES WHO ORDERED TERRI'S DEATH and have sided with the ACLU.

20 posted on 09/24/2004 5:19:27 PM PDT by floriduh voter (www.conservative-spirit.org NATIONAL & FLORIDA ISSUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson