Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia moves to ratify Kyoto Protocol
Boston Globe ^ | September 24, 2004 | Kim Murphy, Los Angeles Times

Posted on 09/24/2004 11:52:46 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

Putin readies measure on global warming for a vote in parliament

MOSCOW -- Key ministries of the Russian government began the process of ratifying the Kyoto Protocol yesterday, signaling that President Vladimir V. Putin is preparing to put the landmark global-warming treaty to a vote in parliament.

After weeks of behind-the-scenes meetings aimed at weighing costs and benefits, including Russia's possible admission later this year into the World Trade Organization, Putin directed his Cabinet ministers to ''sign as soon as possible" the draft ratification documents, the first step toward allowing Russia to join the 1997 accord.

The Ministry of Natural Resources approved the documents yesterday, but the Economic Development and Trade Ministry called for more scrutiny of the pact's economic consequences, signaling a possible fight before ratification could occur. Still, environmental activists said they hoped the issue could be presented to the Russian Parliament within the next several weeks.

Russia's participation is a crucial step toward implementation of the protocol, which requires participating industrialized countries to cut their emissions of greenhouse gases, blamed for what many scientists believe could be a precipitous change in global climate.

The protocol, which cannot take effect unless Russia signs, aims to reduce greenhouse gases to 5.2 percent below 1990 levels by 2012.

Analysts cautioned that Russia's ratification would not be certain until the final package cleared the parliament and was presented to Putin for signature, a warning that reflected the deep divisions that persist within Russia over the benefits of instituting the treaty.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: climatechange; envirnment; environmentalists; kyoto; wackos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

1 posted on 09/24/2004 11:52:47 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Just say "nyet."


2 posted on 09/24/2004 11:53:19 AM PDT by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

They should but Putin is off the reservation.


3 posted on 09/24/2004 11:54:11 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative

PING

The world 4 A.C. (After Clinton).


4 posted on 09/24/2004 11:54:20 AM PDT by MegaSilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I dont know a lot but I am thinking they can't be running clean enough to meet standards


5 posted on 09/24/2004 11:55:09 AM PDT by BookaT (My Cat's Breath smells like Cat Food!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Russia wouldn't honor what they sign, so why not expect them to sign?


6 posted on 09/24/2004 11:56:59 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BookaT
I dont know a lot but I am thinking they can't be running clean enough to meet standards

Kyoto has nothing to do with clean. CO2 is not a pollutant, but a life substaining part of our air.

7 posted on 09/24/2004 11:58:57 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
You read my mind, these guys could sign anything and it wouldn't mean diddly.
8 posted on 09/24/2004 12:08:30 PM PDT by keysguy (Trust the media as far as you can throw them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Why is Putin caring about Kyoto right now??? Doesn't he have some terrorists to go kill???
9 posted on 09/24/2004 12:12:22 PM PDT by Getsmart64 (LANTIRN - Designed to kill, maim, and destroy ....America's enemies...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Getsmart64

Think about who has an opposite stance on Kyoto. That will provide an answer, methinks.


10 posted on 09/24/2004 12:15:50 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Getsmart64

Kyoto is about putting the screws to the U.S. and giving passes to developing countries.


11 posted on 09/24/2004 12:18:21 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

He's decided that an antiUS alliance with the EU is the best bet for Russia. :-( This is Very Bad News...IIRC, once they reach their magic 55% with Russia's signature, the Kyoto Treaty becomes part of international law ,and all nonexempt nations (Exempt : India, China eg) can be subjected to financial penalties to force ratification and compliance. Given all GWB's had to do to try to defend our national sovereignty from the ICC (which we also have not ratified) , I'd say it's a given that sooner or later we will see an embargo against the US in the name of this treaty. I honestly believe the EU and the rest of the world would happily see a worldwide megadepression, if that's the price that must be paid to destroy US sovereignty.


12 posted on 09/24/2004 12:19:51 PM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend


13 posted on 09/24/2004 12:20:11 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP (Make all taxes truly voluntary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: keysguy

We are in fact about the only good industrial GREEN country.

Meaning, we have functional filters on smoke stacks, cars, good filtration in water where the rest of the world does not.

The only ones who can claim to be better at this than us are those who have no industry (MAYBE).

If alternative forms of energy come about to replace oil that are clean, then this treaty would be of no consequence, but as long as we need oil, we can't sign this treaty which is a restriction on success.

Let the rest of the world implement the good filters we have on everything first and then MAYBE we can consider any treaty.

Right now, this treaty and this world tax for starvation treaty is BS.


14 posted on 09/24/2004 12:20:25 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kaylar
"I'd say it's a given that sooner or later we will see an embargo against the US in the name of this treaty."

They have more to lose from such an embargo than we do. Embargos work both ways.

15 posted on 09/24/2004 12:23:13 PM PDT by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kaylar
and all nonexempt nations (Exempt : India, China eg) can be subjected to financial penalties to force ratification and compliance.

How exactly? Please be thourough in your explanation. Omit no details.

There is this fundamental problem I have had since childhood with the concept of "international law" defined by the helpless delusionals.

16 posted on 09/24/2004 12:25:07 PM PDT by Publius6961 (I, also, don't do diplomacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Chirac and the natural gas interests must have offered a lot.

The Russian politicos aren't getting their "oil vouchers" any more from Saddam, maybe some new sources?


17 posted on 09/24/2004 12:26:06 PM PDT by Shermy (Kerry blasts doves. Is that a sign of peace?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Madness of King Vlad
18 posted on 09/24/2004 12:27:45 PM PDT by alex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

this may have something to do with the announcment on Monday by scientists in Antartica of the acceleration of the breakup of the glaciers there.


19 posted on 09/24/2004 12:28:09 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
More eco/feel-good stuff from the lib/rats. You can bet if we ever did sign up there would be a new one that was even more demanding five years later, makes you wonder if it's not just a big power play.
20 posted on 09/24/2004 12:29:45 PM PDT by keysguy (Trust the media as far as you can throw them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson