To: GAGOPSWEEPTOVICTORY
I guess the New York Times can't stand good news. After all the only thing that will help Kerrry is bad news. Good news wouldn't benefit their Golden Boy TM or the Democratic Party politically. Its amazing.
2 posted on
09/24/2004 3:14:29 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
I'm having a very difficult time trying to figure out the last Presidental candidate that actually won on an anti-war, the U.S. is losing message. (Could you even argue Nixon? I wasn't quite born yet to know.)
Americans are optimists by nature. Pessimism and doom and gloom doesn't go over very well except to Kerry's liberal base that would have the government in our every day business if it were up to them.
Those candidates who do spout doom and gloom messages usually go down to a resounding defeat.
To: goldstategop
Ah, a nice tag line: Bad news is good news for the Kerry campaign!
5 posted on
09/24/2004 3:24:49 AM PDT by
endthematrix
(Bad news is good news for the Kerry campaign!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson