I mean, don't ya just hate it? Ya know, when folks see the beginning of a thread, and instead of following the whole story, just jump in at the end the next day, and miss the big news a hundred or so posts earlier. Folks are still thrashing around about 3 Mar 91, when it transpires that K actually was there, Safwan, but on 17 Mar 91. K needs grammar therapy, but his O'Reilly statement was basically correct.
Of course, the bi-polar angle is still valid. How else to explain K's total denial of his presence at the K.C. Nov 71 meeting, or the floating bodies of Olongopao, or his bogus visit to DaNang, etc.
Ok, that explains why he was in the US Senate on March 14th, and then jetted back from Safwan to Vote two days later on March 19th, 'On Passage of the Bill (Final Passage - H.R.1282)'
Yep, it's just amazing that a Senator who so strongly opposed the Gulf War in the first place would fly there to get in on the 'victory party' and still not miss any votes in the Senate.
However, he still lied to O'Reilly - he wasn't there when he said he was.
I wondered why questions were still being asked about his whereabouts that day, trying to determine the date of the signing etc. Man what a lot of duplicate effort, but, if you come into a thread after a lot of posts have already been made, man that is a lot to read through....much more fun to jump in and try to solve the puzzle:)