Posted on 09/23/2004 5:29:54 PM PDT by farmfriend
Fairy Shrimp vs. Man
By C.C. Kraemer
A wide-body jet with 300 passengers lumbers westward on a runway at Los Angeles International Airport toward the ocean on its takeoff roll. About halfway down the runway, the captain pulls back on the yoke and the airliner pokes its nose skyward and climbs powerfully away from the Earth. By the time the jet clears the end of the runway, it will be more than 1,000 feet from the ground.
Swimmers on the beach don't even notice. Neither does a 1-inch crustacean that makes its home in vernal pools -- kids would call them mud puddles -- near the airport. It does not even know the jetliner and the people on it exist.
But that doesn't matter. What counts is the fairy shrimp has advocates who will zealously look out for its best interests -- whatever they might be.
The shrimp lives -- exists? -- in a depression at the end of a runway. Officials have fenced off 108 acres for its privileged use, even though no shrimp worth eating has been found there, just eggs that haven't yet hatched, even after having been in the spot for years. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wants the area to be designated as a preserve for the fairy shrimp. That probably sounds reasonable, since the property is likely to sit idle because of its location. Who would want it for anything? But an argument by LAX officials demonstrates that this is yet another case of man forcing man to yield to a lower life form.
It's not that the relatively small tract has been set aside. It's the ripple effect that area would have. Designating the area as a preserve for the fairy shrimp would require it to have standing water. That attracts birds. Though they both have wings and fly, birds and aircraft do not mix well.
Sometimes the results are disastrous. Yeah, it makes a mess of the bird. But too often it's equally as ruinous for humans. Jetliners full of passengers have been known to go down after sucking birds into their engines.
Takeoff is a critical moment for a flight. If something is thrown off -- even a bird being chewed up by a turbofan engine with 65,000 pounds of thrust -- it makes the takeoff that much more difficult. The Bird Strike Committee USA, made up partly of federal and aviation industry officials, says that a 12-lb Canada goose hitting an aircraft traveling 150-mph at lift-off is similar to the force created when a 1,000-lb weight is dropped from a height of 10 feet. That should be enough to violate the structural integrity of the hull of any jetliner.
The Los Angeles Times reports that LAX recorded 632 wildlife strikes from 1990 to 2004. Not all were bird strikes and none apparently caused a crash. But a KLM jumbo jet was in danger after a seagull was sucked into one of its engines in August 2000. It made an emergency landing, but not after the plane was damaged and passengers -- there were 449 people aboard -- no doubt had some anxious moments, as well they should: Since 1988, nearly 200 people have died across the world from incidents caused by bird strikes.
The economic costs of bird strikes are high, as well, more than $500 million a year. This isn't a trivial matter.
So, with all these hurdles, why establish a wildlife preserve that will clearly add risk to outbound flights at LAX, the world's fifth and the country's third busiest airport? For the same reason that Marines training at Camp Pendleton 60 or so miles south of LAX have their amphibious beach assault training interrupted because of a small gray songbird called the gnatcatcher.
Or why farmers in the Klamath basin at the California-Oregon border have been denied precious irrigation water because federal officials have, at various times, diverted it to the suckerfish, an endangered species that was given priority over man.
It's the same old story. The locations and critters change. But the forces behind the ongoing effort to elevate lesser beasts above man remain the same. The most radical among them believe that humans are a blight on the Earth. It doesn't matter to them what the battleground is, just so long as humans lose another round.
The author is a TCS Contributor living in California.
Geez, I saw the headline "fairy shrimp man" and I immediately thought of Skerry, before I didn't.
LAX Sea Monkey Bump.
Snicker.
Heheh. I thought it was going to be about the debates.
The answer is clear: Leave the air for the birds, and keep our fossil fuel guzzling airliners grounded.
They are actually doing this here in Sacramento. They are creating bird sanctuary right next to the airport. It already has the highest bird hit record in the nation. Let's add more birds. Brilliant idea!
I can't tell you how this annoys me. Do you know what a FAIRY shrimp is, farmfriend? I have on tape somewhere a show that was on the Discovery Channel a couple years ago. It was about the 10 most hard to kill creatures on earth. Fairy Shrimp (these were in Africa) were one of the 10. You can freeze 'em. You can boil 'em, for 10 minutes, but it won't kill 'em. They are EVERYWHERE.
Remember Sea Monkeys? Fairy Shrimp.
It would be a darned shame if some careless fuel truck driver just happened to spill a few thousand gallons of JP-5 into that depression, then carelessly disposed of a lit cigarette therein. Clumsy, stupid truck driver - he'd be single-handedly responsible for removing ("barbequing") the Fish and Wildlife Service's "preserve".
That's a bad idea. Near an airport. More birds will hit airplanes and cause a disaster that could kill many people.
There are hidden contradictions in the minds of people who "love Nature" while deploring the "artificialities" with which "Man has spoiled 'Nature.'" The obvious contradiction lies in their choice of words, which imply that Man and his artifacts are not part of "Nature" -- but beavers and their dams are. But the contradictions go deeper than this prima-facie absurdity. In declaring his love for a beaver dam (erected by beavers for beavers' purposes) and his hatred for dams erected by men (for the purposes of men) the "naturist" reveals his hatred for his own race -- i.e., his own self hatred.
In the case of "Naturists" such self-hatred is understandable; they are such a sorry lot. But hatred is too strong an emotion to feel toward them; pity and contempt are the most they rate.
As for me, willy-nilly I am a man, not a beaver, and H. sapiens is the only race I have or can have. Fortunately for me, I like being part of a race made up of men and women -- it strikes me as a fine arrangement and perfectly "natural."
Robert Heinlein
See my post number 9.
Still smartin' from when they got shut down for two hours so Billy could get a haircut, I see.
I guess so. They are doing this up in Sac too. Only they want to create a bird sanctuary next to the airport. The airport with the highest bird hit numbers in the nation. Go figure!
YES! I am a South Park Republican.
Sweet.
"Swimmers on the beach don't even notice."
As someone who used to live just across the street from the South Runway at LAX, I have two comments.
1) The swimmers notice
2) the shoreline all along there is already protected area because of the "El Segundo Blue" butterfly, a RARE species of Butterfly, not to be confused with the very rare "Palos Verdes Blue" butterfly, or the very rare "Venice Beach" Blue" butterfly, or the very rare "Marina Del Rey Blue" Butterfly or the very rare "corner of Pershing Boulevard and Manchester Boulevard Blue" butterfly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.