Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robe; RadioAstronomer; PatrickHenry

Think about that scenario (gun-type fission weapon). Not only does that require some fancy equipment (albeit nothing like a fusion weapon), but the dropper is going to be moving around a rather lethal amount of nuclear material. Unless these guys build a shield for the core, which would make it quite large, you are going to basically have a bomb that will kill its handlers in short order. But I am just theorizing. Let me ping some people for input.


27 posted on 09/22/2004 11:08:40 AM PDT by Shryke (Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Shryke
You gotta look at the bright side of things. The blast will likely go off in a blue state. Because of the catastrophic loss of life, they'll lose at least one House member after the following census. We'll solidify our control of Congress.

(Or maybe I've been freeping too long.}

55 posted on 09/22/2004 12:14:37 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (I'm PatrickHenry and I approve this message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Shryke
Unless these guys build a shield for the core, which would make it quite large, you are going to basically have a bomb that will kill its handlers in short order

Most fissionable material is not dangerously radioactive. The exception is U-233.

81 posted on 09/22/2004 1:22:17 PM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson