Skip to comments.
Why the right absolutely needs Dan Rather for its adrenaline and survival (BLAMES VRWC & FR)
Chicago Tribune ^
| September 22, 2004
| Clarence the Crosseyed Page
Posted on 09/22/2004 7:26:18 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Clarence certainly isn't too happy with FreeRepublic and would like to shoot the messenger.
To: Chi-townChief
Oh he is so right. Woe is me if they get rid of Dan Rather. Then there would be no partisan liberal hacks in the mainstream media for us to complain about.
< / sarcasm>
2
posted on
09/22/2004 7:29:24 AM PDT
by
VRWCmember
(I actually ignored this thread before I posted to it. jfk, 08/2004)
To: Chi-townChief
Ah, don't worry about. He looks foolish attaching himself to Rather.
3
posted on
09/22/2004 7:30:53 AM PDT
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
To: Chi-townChief
to former CBS newsman Bernard Goldberg's book, "Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News," which is largely a recounting of how much Rather and Goldberg disagreed on how the news should be covered. to former CBS newsman William Shirer's book "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich," which is largely a recounting of how much Hitler and Roosevelt disagreed on methods for keeping the trains running on schedule.
(steely)
To: Chi-townChief
This is exactly what they said about Limbaugh when krinton left the White House.
They was wrong.
There are more than enough juicy Leftist targets to last for a generation or more. Not to mention that fact that we have a nation to repair once the RAT feces are washed away.
5
posted on
09/22/2004 7:32:25 AM PDT
by
WorkingClassFilth
(Savor the present as the days of Kerry's whine and poses. It'll be a nice memory when you are old.)
To: Chi-townChief
A lot of Rather's critics on the right say they want him to go, but they really want him to stay No, they don't. Theres always the possibility CBS will replace him with something more "balanced". Besides, whoever they replace him with cant be much worse.
To: Chi-townChief
Is this story attempting to divert attention away from the facts. Huh? Why would they do that? (rhetorical)
7
posted on
09/22/2004 7:33:30 AM PDT
by
The Real Eddie01
(John Kerry is Flakier than a Crisco Pie Crust)
To: Chi-townChief
I hope that Viacom allows its rabid pit bulls, its on crack c BS NotNews division to continue to lie and deny.
This has to be helping GW.
After GW hammers Kerry, then Viacom can retire/fire everyone in their various NotNews divisions and cancel all of their programs. Then they can have some phoney reality show instead for their advertisers.
Clarence should do an expose oped about a major newspaper corporation which commits daily acts of fraud on its advertisers by lying about the paid subscribers for its various fishwraps across America.
8
posted on
09/22/2004 7:34:10 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(When will the ABCNNBC BS lunatic libs stop Rathering to Americans? Answer: NEVER!)
To: Chi-townChief
I would agree too that we have more than an ample supply of frothing leftist media icons to keep setting a good reference point for the world !!! Way too many.
9
posted on
09/22/2004 7:34:44 AM PDT
by
EagleUSA
To: Chi-townChief
Clarence seems a bit jealous.
Don't worry Page, we're watching you too!
10
posted on
09/22/2004 7:36:10 AM PDT
by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(Kerry is the Ramsey Clark of our time.)
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: Chi-townChief
A lot of Rather's critics on the right say they want him to go, but they really want him to stay.Nope. Once Rather is gone, it'll be time to move on to Peter Jennings. But don't worry Clarence we won't get to you for quite some times. Besides the media need a few court jesters.
12
posted on
09/22/2004 7:42:01 AM PDT
by
Faraday
To: Chi-townChief
13
posted on
09/22/2004 7:42:54 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
To: Chi-townChief
Here's some news for Clarence Page. He get's something right in his haruange against rightwingers. We are right. Right?
14
posted on
09/22/2004 7:45:09 AM PDT
by
billhilly
(If you're lurking here from DU (Democrats unglued), I trust this post will make you sick)
To: Chi-townChief
Clarence Page is as politically bigoted as Dan Rather. However, Page is such a nothing in the media scheme of things that he's not worth the energy to attack. Plus his bigotry is so clumsy and obvious that he brings himself down; we don't have to do the job.
There are plenty of people who are high enough and slick enough to be dangerous to truth. Katie Couric comes to mind for some reason. I think Page is envious of the attention that Rather is getting, that Page will never get.
Congressman Billybob
Latest column, "The Manifesto of Pukin Dog"
If you haven't already joined the anti-CFR effort, please click here.
To: Chi-townChief
Hey, "right-wing" talk radio survived the loss of Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders. I think Rather's departure won't be as big a loss.
To: Chi-townChief
We can do without Rather. There's never been a shortage of idiots in this country.
17
posted on
09/22/2004 7:48:17 AM PDT
by
claudiustg
(Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
To: Chi-townChief
I get sick of the use of the term "right-winger", when so many of the dems are left-wingers but we never hear that used.
18
posted on
09/22/2004 7:52:07 AM PDT
by
Rennes Templar
("The future ain't what it used to be".........Yogi Berra)
To: Congressman Billybob; Chi-townChief
Bump!
BTW, do we have an account name and password for chicagotribune.com? I'd like to read the article, but I don't want to register.
19
posted on
09/22/2004 7:54:01 AM PDT
by
EdReform
(Free Republic - helping to keep our country a free republic. Thank you for your financial support!)
To: Dallas59
Now thete's an impressive array of flannel prints. I wonder how much impact this will have on the fashion world. LOL.
Looks like a "dangerous" bunch to me.
20
posted on
09/22/2004 7:54:35 AM PDT
by
Mister Baredog
((Part of the Reagan legacy is to re-elect G.W. Bush))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson