To: rwilson99
Just providing everyone with the "Can't comment on ongoing litigation" excuse. The suit will be dropped in the first week of November.
8 posted on
09/21/2004 9:18:35 PM PDT by
Petronski
(What did Terri McAuliffe know and when did she know it?)
To: Petronski
You got it. It is a play to keep everyone from finding out what we need to know.
24 posted on
09/21/2004 9:33:04 PM PDT by
TheLion
To: Petronski
Won't a criminal investigation trump a civil matter? It seems to me that any "nondisclosure agreement" would not apply if the DA starts asking questions. Rather than bottling up the truth of this matter, Burkett's action will galvanize an investigation, expediting the collapse of the coverup.
BTW--Been reading the site for a several days (yes, Rathergate is responsible). Just want to say that I deeply appreciate everyone's labors on behalf of a Better World.
80 posted on
09/21/2004 11:36:19 PM PDT by
Cyclopean Squid
(W's Will is the Force of History)
To: Petronski
Just providing everyone with the "Can't comment on ongoing litigation" excuse.
I was chuckling at this article until I read your post. I'm afraid you nailed it dead on.
82 posted on
09/21/2004 11:38:00 PM PDT by
BJClinton
(Donwload "The New Soldier" at http://freekerrybook.org/documents/NEWSOLDIER.pdf)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson