To: pieces of time
The article contains a provocative title but it's garbage. The contents of the article do not support the title at all and all the information the democrats released at that time reflect exactly what was in the papers the Whitehouse released.
To: PretzeLogic
You have done a fabulous job - so nice to see it all laid out.
A suggestion: Do we need to reference where we got the dates as we go along? Might help later when we have conflicts.
38 posted on
09/21/2004 5:52:31 PM PDT by
ClancyJ
(Vote for President Bush - For our grandchildren. Democrats are not to be trusted with our country)
To: Rightwing Conspiratr1
The article contains a provocative title but it's garbage. The contents of the article do not support the title at all and all the information the democrats released at that time reflect exactly what was in the papers the Whitehouse released.
You're talking about the NewsMax article, right?
Why do you think the content of article does not support the conclusion? I am not trying to be snotty. I need to know what you mean so we can decide whether to include it in the next update.
40 posted on
09/21/2004 5:55:30 PM PDT by
PretzeLogic
(Those who run from the facts only find the truth by stumbling into it accidentally.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson