[PretzeLogic]

The article contains a provocative title but it's garbage. The contents of the article do not support the title at all and all the information the democrats released at that time reflect exactly what was in the papers the Whitehouse released.

You're talking about the NewsMax article, right?

Why do you think the content of article does not support the conclusion? I am not trying to be snotty. I need to know what you mean so we can decide whether to include it in the next update.

[Rightwing Conspiratr1]

You're talking about the NewsMax article, right?

Yes.

Why do you think the content of article does not support the conclusion?

I said the content of the article does not support the title. All of the information quoted in the article is verbatim from the 29 Sep 72 document released by the Whitehouse, and does not indicate ANY knowledge of other other documents, especially the forged documents.

This document: http://users.cis.net/coldfeet/grounded.gif

From the Newsmax article... The April 27 press release does show, however, that the topic of Bush's flight suspension by Killian was very much on the Kerry campaign's radar screen at least four months before CBS broadcast forged military records to further document the story.

Hell everybody on FreeRepublic knew about this document too. It's old news. Like many Newsmax articles it's much sound and fury about nothing.