Posted on 09/21/2004 2:09:30 PM PDT by harrycarey
For Immediate Release September 21, 2004 Contact: Jano Cabrera 202-863-8148
MCAULIFFE: WILL GOP ANSWER IF THEY KNOW WHETHER STONE, OTHERS HAD INVOLVEMENT WITH CBS DOCUMENTS?
Washington, D.C. - In response to false Republican accusations regarding the CBS documents, Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe issued this statement:
“In today’s New York Post, Roger Stone, who became associated with political ‘dirty tricks’ while working for Nixon, refused to deny that he was the source the CBS documents.
“Will Ed Gillespie or the White House admit today what they know about Mr. Stone’s relationship with these forged documents? Will they unequivocally rule out Mr. Stone’s involvement? Or for that matter, others with a known history of dirty tricks, such as Karl Rove or Ralph Reed?”
Paid for and authorized by the Democratic National Committee, www.democrats.org . This communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee
I'll take "How low can they go?" for $100, Alex.
Oh well........their buddies gave them the rope and they are doing a good job of hanging themselves. I never thought I could be grateful to the MSM, but I'll give credit when due...........lol.
Here's how they can do this:
From http://www.theallineed.com/ad-health-1/health-041.htm
"But the "malignant" narcissist consistently manifests at least 5 of these 9 criteria.
Here are the 9 criteria. Having 5 of these 9 "qualifies" you as a narcissist...
1 - Feels grandiose and self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents to the point of lying, demands to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)
2 - Is obsessed with fantasies of unlimited success, fame, fearsome power or omnipotence, unequalled brilliance (the cerebral narcissist), bodily beauty or sexual performance (the somatic narcissist), or ideal, everlasting, all-conquering love or passion
3 - Firmly convinced that he or she is unique and, being special, can only be understood by, should only be treated by, or associate with, other special or unique, or high-status people (or institutions)
4 - Requires excessive admiration, adulation, attention and affirmation - or, failing that, wishes to be feared and to be notorious (narcissistic supply).
5 - Feels entitled. Expects unreasonable or special and favourable priority treatment. Demands automatic and full compliance with his or her expectations
6 - Is "interpersonally exploitative", i.e., uses others to achieve his or her own ends
7 - Devoid of empathy. Is unable or unwilling to identify with or acknowledge the feelings and needs of others
8 - Constantly envious of others or believes that they feel the same about him or her
9 - Arrogant, haughty behaviours or attitudes coupled with rage when frustrated, contradicted, or confronted.
More Info:
http://groups.msn.com/PSYCHOPATH/projectionaglimpseofhell.msnw
"Criticizing others is a dangerous thing, not so much because you may make mistakes about them, but because you may be revealing the truth about yourself." Judge Harold Medina
OOOOh, now you are on to something.
The party's over, it's time to call it a day,
They've burst your pretty balloon and taken the moon away.
It's time to wind up the masquerade,
Just make you mind up, the piper must be paid.
The Roger Stone theory?
I was trolling their sites last night .. even after CBS apolized and said the memo's were fake .. These Loons still believe the memos are real
Stone managed Al Sharpton's primary campaign. The Rats are grasping at straws.
No, that chain of custody makes perfect sense to me. I'm confused about who is the evil mastermind here, Rove or Stone.
I'm looking for elucidation from all the esteemed members of the VRWC present here!
here's the "Story"...look at the very last blurb.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=106&ncid=742&e=1&u=/nypost/20040920/cm_nypost/thetruthaboutriflestatistics
Next then will demand that the Jews stop their harassment of Hitler!
Lunatic Fringe
I know you're out there
You're in hiding
And you hold your meetings
We can hear you coming
We know what you're after
We're wise to you this time
We won't let you kill the laughter
Lunatic Fringe
In the twilight's last gleaming
This is open season
But you won't get too far
We know you've got to blame someone
For your own confusion
But we're on guard this time
Against your final solution
We can hear you coming
(We can hear you coming)
No you're not going to win this time
We can hear the footsteps
(We can hear the footsteps)
Way out along the walkway
Lunatic Fringe
We know you're out there
But in these new dark ages
There will still be light
An eye for an eye
Well, before you go under
Can you feel the resistance
Can you feel the....thunder
Those still backing Kerry are truly psychotic lunatics.
Thanks for the link. I cannot imagine that Burkett would be protecting Roger Stone. Burkett would gladly give stone up to hurt Bush. (Of course, this assumes that Burkett did not forge them himself, which is the most likely explanation of events--there is no Lucy Ramirez)
OTOH, why 'no comment' by Stone. That is a weird response if the question was posed directly. But the article just says he had no comment when contacted, not that he had no comment when asked if he forged the memos.
Oh well. More will be revealed.
"Ah, the good old days."
They refuse to grow up and join the 21st Century.
I am glad the adults are in charge -- and still will be, after Nov. 2.
These college pranks fool only those who wouldn't vote for President Bush if it would save their lives. (And, well, it just might . . .)
Karl Rove: the one armed man on the grassy knoll who fled in a white Bronco to Roswell.
Look at Kerry's speech today.
Look at this accusation.
The Deaniacs have taken over.
Fight to the end so we can bury these people poltically.
Such delusional minds are dangerous, and should not be allowed anywhere near the seats of power.
Actually, the memos are just a clever diversionary tactic to prevent the real truth from emerging: Rather is a Rove plant!
So, what you're saying is that it wasn't a situation where the Post asked Stone, and he said "no comment", or soemthing to that effect? Boy, the Dems are desperate, aren't they?
43 and counting down, is this what they want to see election day?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.