[stockpirate]

No they didn't, I forget the man's name but he is someone that was with CNN at the beginning and they were kinda star struck and they didn't refute him.

But it was just more Socialist poop.

[turbocat]

Small light bulb here - and it doesn't sound like much on the surface, but consider this:

Dan comes on and says we were "mislead by someone who changed their story". Sounds plausible on the surface.

But that has NOTHING to do with running the story and the document evidence. It's real or it isn't. They are forged or they're not. Interviews were NOT conducted (killians, secretary, Hodges recanting, Staudt). So I don't care WHO changed a story - this is a red herring.... a diversion apology