Dan comes on and says we were "mislead by someone who changed their story". Sounds plausible on the surface.
But that has NOTHING to do with running the story and the document evidence. It's real or it isn't. They are forged or they're not. Interviews were NOT conducted (killians, secretary, Hodges recanting, Staudt). So I don't care WHO changed a story - this is a red herring.... a diversion apology
Yup! Rather & Kerry hope this is going to blow over and we'll forget about this. NEVER! This is huge!