USA TODAY was had too, and wants its pound of flesh.
"USA TODAY has a copy of the phony documents, as well as two more, also likely phony.
USA TODAY was had too, and wants its pound of flesh."
The other two ARE phony. The first one in the set doesn't even bother with trying to forge a Killian signature, and has an 01 day military date.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-09-09bushdocs.pdf
USAT should come clean about its own forged set. They have the chance for an inside scoop here. Why are they holding back?
The sharks are going in for the kill. Today CBS. Tomorrow the DNC. The day after ...
Yes the other two are actually worse that the 4 pushed by CBS - apparently that's why CBS did not attempt to use them
Why is there so much secrecy regarding those other two documents? Why hasn't USA Today published them? Why didn't CBS? They are part of the story. Perhaps an important part, so why the secrecy?
Ok, CBS used only four of them for it's story, but so what. Why are the other two memos being held back? Is there more to this story that is still being investigated? Stuff that is contained in those memos that they don't want to tip us about? More they plan to unleash but don't want tarnished by fraudulent docs?
I smell a rat but then, why shouldn't I?