Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS Apologizes Over Bush Guard Duty Memos
Yahoo ^ | Sept 20th, 2004 | DAVID BAUDER

Posted on 09/20/2004 5:08:40 PM PDT by The_Republican

NEW YORK - CBS News apologized Monday for a "mistake in judgment" in its story questioning President Bush (news - web sites)'s National Guard service, claiming it was misled by the source of documents that several experts have dismissed as fakes. 

The network said it would appoint an independent panel to look at its reporting about the memos. The story has mushroomed into a major media scandal, threatening the reputations of CBS News and chief anchor Dan Rather.

It also became an issue in the presidential campaign. The White House said the affair raises questions about the connections between CBS's source, retired Texas National Guard officer Bill Burkett, and Democrat John Kerry (news - web sites)'s campaign.

Rather joined CBS News President Andrew Heyward in issuing an apology Monday.

"We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry," Rather said. "It was an error that was made, however, in good faith and in the spirit of trying to carry on a CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism."

Almost immediately after the story aired Sept. 8, document experts questioned memos purportedly written by Bush's late squadron leader, Lt. Col. Jerry B. Killian, saying they appeared to have been created on a computer and not on the kind of typewriter in use during the 1970s.

CBS strongly defended its story. It wasn't until a week later — after Killian's former secretary said she believed the memos were fake — did the news division admit they were questionable.

Burkett admitted this weekend to CBS that he lied about obtaining the documents from another former National Guard member, the network said. CBS hasn't been able to conclusively tell how he got them, or even definitely tell whether they're fakes or not. But the network has given up trying to defend them.

"Based on what we now know, CBS News cannot prove that the documents are authentic, which is the only acceptable journalistic standard to justify using them in the report," Heyward said. "We should not have used them."

The Associated Press could not immediately reach Burkett for comment. Rather was set to interview Burkett Monday night on CBS' evening news program.

Heyward told The Associated Press it was not clear what, if any, disciplinary action would be taken against CBS News employees. Besides tainting the network's flagship broadcast, "60 Minutes," the report was a damaging blow to Rather, 72. Some have suggested the scandal, along with the low ratings of the "CBS Evening News," could hasten Rather's retirement.

"Please know that nothing is more important to us than people's trust in our ability and our commitment to report fairly and truthfully," Rather said.

Alex Jones, director of Harvard University's Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, said it appeared to be an honest mistake by CBS, not a willful attempt to deceive. But he said the network was too slow to respond.

"I think that their delaying and obvious resistance to acknowledge the evident realities has kept the story alive a lot longer than it needed to be and was a lot more damaging to CBS than it needed to be," he said.

For "60 Minutes," it's the biggest ethical mess since the 1995 incident captured in the movie "The Insider," which depicted the newsmagazine caving to pressure from CBS lawyers and not airing a whistleblowing report from an ex-tobacco executive.

Jones said questions will probably center on the story's producer, Mary Mapes. She's one of the network's top investigators and broke the story of the Abu Ghraib prison abuse scandal photos. Her immediate boss is Josh Howard, recently named executive producer of the "60 Minutes" Wednesday edition.

White House press secretary Scott McClellan said the White House appreciated CBS's expression of regret but that there were still serious questions about Burkett.

"Bill Burkett, who CBS now says is their source, in fact is not an unimpeachable source as was previously claimed," McLellan said. "Bill Burkett is a source who has been discredited and so this raises a lot of questions. There were media reports about Mr. Burkett having senior level contacts with the Kerry campaign."

The Kerry campaign has said it had nothing to do with the story.

Burkett, a Democrat, sent an e-mail last month to several Texas Democrats, saying he had passed along information to former Georgia senator and Kerry supporter Max Cleland about information that would counter criticism of Kerry's Vietnam War service.

Cleland said Monday that he does "not have any knowledge" about documents used to support the "60 Minutes" story.

Heyward told The AP he has "no reason to believe either the Kerry campaign or the Bush campaign was involved in this."

"A lot of reporting went into this story," Heyward said. "It's not as if one person's account was taken at face value."

The call for an independent review was reminiscent of CNN's "Tailwind" scandal in 1998. The cable network retracted a story that the U.S. military had used nerve gas in Laos during the Vietnam war.

CNN appointed independent panels to look into the "Tailwind" story and the missed election calls of 2000. Both panels helped to restore trust in the network and resulted in real changes to the networks' operation, said Tom Johnson, CNN's chief executive at the time.

"As with all professions, we screw up at time," Johnson said. "We need to admit it when we do."

The so-called Killian documents indicated he was being pressured to "sugarcoat" the performance ratings of a young Bush, then the son of a former Texas congressman, and that Bush failed to follow orders to take a physical. Killian died in 1984.

Heyward said he did not think CBS' story was the result of any bias against Bush. The National Guard service story was "a legitimate area of inquiry" that several news organizations were pursuing, he said.

"The story of how this happened is going to be a much more interesting story than the veracity of these documents," Jones said, "and I hope CBS will tell it."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: apologizes; apology; cbs; cbsnews; memos; rathergate; wewantarrests; wewantconvictions
Sounds Like a Klintonian apology. However, AP thinks this was an 'Apology'.
1 posted on 09/20/2004 5:08:41 PM PDT by The_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

The more facts that come out, the more Dan's ignorance seems to be of the willful variety.


2 posted on 09/20/2004 5:10:03 PM PDT by NavVet (“Benedeict Arnold was wounded in battle fighting for America, but no one remembers him for that.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican; Buckhead
Almost immediately after the story aired Sept. 8, document experts questioned memos purportedly written by Bush's late squadron leader, Lt. Col. Jerry B. Killian, saying they appeared to have been created on a computer and not on the kind of typewriter in use during the 1970s.

hey Buckhead- now you're a document expert. Congrats. now you can start billing the big money. ;-)

3 posted on 09/20/2004 5:10:55 PM PDT by lawgirl (It's not about Vietnam- it's about John Kerry's lies about Vietnam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

They still intend to assert the truthfulness of the story.


4 posted on 09/20/2004 5:10:58 PM PDT by FreedomSurge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
Max Cleland's schedule on August 25 in Texas needs to be fully examined. Cleland tried to deliver a letter to President Bush around 1pm in Crawford, followed immediately by a short press conference. When did he leave Texas, where did he leave from, and what did he do in the time in between?

Only days prior to Cleland's impromptu visit to Texas, he began discussions with Bill Burkett, who is now known to be CBS's source for the forged documents.

Later the same day of Cleland's Texas trip, Burkett announced in a rant to President Bush on the progressive onlinejournal that, "I know from your files that we have now reassembled, the fact that you did not fulfill your oath, taken when you were commissioned to 'obey the orders of the officers appointed over you'."

What time was this rant posted?
Did Cleland help him write it?
Who is the "we" Burkett is referring to concerned the documents being "reassembled"?

Crawford, Texas, where Cleland was at 1pm on August 25, is only 162 miles from Baird, Bill Burkett's home.

Did Cleland make a visit there that day?

Did someone in the Kerry campaign act as a middleman in passing along the information to CBS that Burkett had these documents?

Did someone in the Kerry campaign lobby CBS to use these documents or vouch for their authenticity?

CBS claimed that these documents came from "unimpeachable sources."
Other than Burkett, who are the other sources?
Why did CBS consider Burkett "unimpeachable"?

CBS must answer the question of how they learned that Burkett now had these memos. Did the discovery of these new documents play a part in Ben Barnes decision that he was now ready to talk to 60 Minutes on air, after Mary Mapes had long been urging him to do so? Is there a connection between this sudden change of heart by Barnes just two days before CBS hit "paydirt" with these forged documents?
Did Ben Barnes see these documents even before CBS did?
5 posted on 09/20/2004 5:10:59 PM PDT by counterpunch (The CouNTeRPuNcH Collection - www.counterpunch.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
"Based on what we now know, CBS News cannot prove that the documents are authentic, which is the only acceptable journalistic standard to justify using them in the report," Heyward said. "We should not have used them."

"cannot prove that the documents are authentic" is a long way from admission that they were fake. They are trying to make the story go away without admitting guilt

6 posted on 09/20/2004 5:13:57 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (That which does not kill me had better be able to run away damn fast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
When do we start the betting pool on Burkett coming down with a case of the Little Rock Flu. If we only start with the date we will need to have a tiebreaker, such as cause of demise.
7 posted on 09/20/2004 5:15:07 PM PDT by USNBandit (Florida military absentee voter number 537.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

Is a "mistake in judgement" the same thing as lying out our A-Holes? Dan, we just what to know!


8 posted on 09/20/2004 5:16:03 PM PDT by SoggyBottomBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

Isn't it great!!! CBS WILL APPOINT A PANEL TO INTERNALLY INVESTIGATE....

That is like appointing the fox to count chickens in the hen house!!!!! What a RUSE. These guys are as bad at damage control AS THEY ARE AT LYING.

C-BS, you are dead !!!!! Don't waste your time.


9 posted on 09/20/2004 5:20:50 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

Until danny "girl" goes in front of the cameras and say, "Mr. President, I was wrong in using these false memos to bring unsubstantiated claims of your shirking of your duty in the National Guard, and I humbly, and sincerely apologize for bringing dishonor to your name, your party, and to the Presidency of the United States of America. I hope you will find it in your heart to forgive me for such an amateurish "mistake", especially when it involved your credibility as a National Guardsman, and Commander-In-Chief of our loyal, courageous, armed forces. Because I have made such a blunder which could have influenced the election this november, I will immediately resign my position as head of CBS News, and even as a news reporter. Please accept my humble apology, and once again I sincerely, humbly apologize for my blatant mistake", I will consider what dan rather said today as a CYA statement only!!!


10 posted on 09/20/2004 5:25:39 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican

You would think that uncovering a story about how the DNC forwarded forged documents to influence a Presidential election would be interesting to CBS.


11 posted on 09/20/2004 5:30:42 PM PDT by BadAndy (Specializing in unnecessarily harsh comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
Alex Jones, director of Harvard University's Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, said it appeared to be an honest mistake by CBS, not a willful attempt to deceive.

No, attempted character assasination of a sitting US president stemming from the use of unsubstantiated documents is not an "honest mistake" but Rather the result of an aggressive political agenda by an overzealous network and biased anchorman. Jones is just another Haaavaaard liberal who's an enabler for the Dems.

12 posted on 09/20/2004 5:33:35 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
...start the betting pool on Burkett coming down with a case of the Little Rock Flu.

October 13th, 2004

Tiebreaker: 'heart attack'

13 posted on 09/20/2004 5:36:24 PM PDT by JOAT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican
Too Little Too Late cBS proved itself to be a tool of the far left.
14 posted on 09/20/2004 5:44:44 PM PDT by Fast1 (Kerry for an Islamic America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican; All
Please Email This Man And Ask Him: On what facts do you base the assumption that CBS made an honest mistake, and that they were not pursuing a biased agenda?

Alex Jones, director of Harvard University's Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, said it appeared to be an honest mistake by CBS, not a willful attempt to deceive.

email: alex_jones@ksg.harvard.edu
Assistant email: mailto:jessica_cole@ksg.harvard.edu

15 posted on 09/20/2004 5:51:42 PM PDT by antaresequity (Pajamahadeen member before 2.28.02)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Republican; martin_fierro
Now I see why sKerry has imported every x42i operative money can buy. Those guys were pros!

A scandal with this ending never would have happened on Hitlery's watch!

Those memos would have been perfect from jump-street, delivered with the finesse' of catwoman, leaked at first, then finally exposed! Then, when doubt had been cast, another scandal would erupt in mid-sentence and divert attention from the first! Chaos would ensue and the evil socialists would have triumphed again!

Those were the days!

Now all we get is DandyDrather crying for forgiveness. What a let down.

Who's next? :-)~

16 posted on 09/20/2004 5:54:15 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson