Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE KINKO'S CAPER (David Van Os Speaks)
TAS - Letters ^ | 9/20/04 | David Van Os

Posted on 09/20/2004 2:24:52 PM PDT by swilhelm73

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 09/20/2004 2:24:52 PM PDT by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

This guy sounds like he is going to be a fountain of unintentional comedy throughout this thing.


2 posted on 09/20/2004 2:29:07 PM PDT by xcullen (DC Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
My real statement to the Times was that if hypothetically an individual in 2004 sat at a word processor and tried to create replicas of documents that they believed existed in 1972 or 1973, that could not change whatever the objective reality was of what George W. Bush was doing or not doing or where he was or wasn't at the times in question. My statement is such a plain truth that it hardly needed to be said.

This is the funniest thing I've read in days.

3 posted on 09/20/2004 2:30:18 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

This really is the funniest unintentionally funny, genuine statement I have read in years! Really.


4 posted on 09/20/2004 2:33:30 PM PDT by liberlog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

So, if I sat at my "typewriter" and pounded out that
David Van Os was, in 1997, a lying piece of Communist
scum that whipped his employees and forced then to perform
unnatural acts, that doesn't change the objective reality
of the upstanding fellow David Van Os really is.

But if I get CBS to plaster that reputation-smashing
memo across the network, no big deal, huh...just because
you're such a work of ethical art?


5 posted on 09/20/2004 2:38:06 PM PDT by plangent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

You can tell a lot about a client from his lawyer.


6 posted on 09/20/2004 2:38:54 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
This is the funniest thing I've read in days.

No kidding.

"that could not change whatever the objective reality was of what George W. Bush was doing or not doing or where he was or wasn't at the times in question."

But they sure as hell forged some documents to attempt to 'prove'
"whatever the objective reality was of what George W. Bush was doing or not doing or where he was or wasn't at the times in question."

This whole thing is really starting to make me sick.

7 posted on 09/20/2004 2:40:16 PM PDT by GaltMeister (I'm just a Pajamahadeen cog in the wheels of the VRWC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
Sincerely, -- David Van Os San Antonio, Texas

Translation:
Insincerely, -- David Van Os for Place #9 on the Texas Supreme Court.

8 posted on 09/20/2004 2:40:21 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (What did Dan Rather know, and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
"The taxpaying citizens have a right to get answers to the questions of what he was doing and why and where he was and why during the times that Ms. Knox refers to, times when he was previously serving as an employee of the citizens and taxpayers of America."

I'm sure that Mr. Van Os is equally insistent on Kerry signing that "180" form so the taxpaying citizens can also see what Kerry really did in the military.

NOT!!!

9 posted on 09/20/2004 2:42:09 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
It is absurd to expect anyone to believe that an individual intelligent enough to be President of the United States cannot remember any details about significant events in his life.

This is my favorite sentence from this Kerry supporter. Others will have their own favorites. But this one I just feel drawn to linger over.

10 posted on 09/20/2004 2:43:27 PM PDT by Taliesan (fiction police)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
Based upon my personal knowledge of Bill Burkett's character from knowing him and knowing of his reputation among his peers, I will state unequivocally that Bill Burkett did not falsify or create the "CBS documents." I do not assume that anyone falsified or created those documents until more is known, but if anyone did, it was not Bill Burkett. I will stake my reputation and good name on this certainty.

Then....who did create the forgeries, Sherlock? The plot thickens!

11 posted on 09/20/2004 2:44:34 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Couldn't try and create funnier stuff than that. Keep it up boys.


12 posted on 09/20/2004 2:45:10 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (My Father was 10x the hero John Fraud Kerry is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: xcullen

ping David Van Os....


13 posted on 09/20/2004 2:47:07 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

I think they just appeared out of the blue. Obviously divine creations. (I know I have felt heavenly after they appeared.)


14 posted on 09/20/2004 2:47:37 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (My Father was 10x the hero John Fraud Kerry is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
yeah... and he used a FORGED signature because???
15 posted on 09/20/2004 2:54:31 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

Wow! He wants to be a Supreme Court Judge! He sees nothing wrong with a national TV news anchor/managing editor of NEWS attending a partisan political function!


16 posted on 09/20/2004 3:04:01 PM PDT by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
"...objective reality..."

The objective reality for us, Mr. Os is that your client now states he did accept forged documents from a source he is protecting. Is your client in the news media and accorded First Amendment protections the media always cites?
17 posted on 09/20/2004 3:04:03 PM PDT by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
I will stake my reputation and good name on this certainty.

Oh yeah, David? Well, I'll see your good name and reputation and I'll raise you eight cents, Canadian.

18 posted on 09/20/2004 3:07:32 PM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

Did an 86 year old secretary type this crap?


19 posted on 09/20/2004 3:07:41 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
I will state unequivocally that Bill Burkett did not falsify or create the "CBS documents." I do not assume that anyone falsified or created those documents until more is known, but if anyone did, it was not Bill Burkett. I will stake my reputation and good name on this certainty.

Okay Van Os, tell us who DID create the phony documents. You must know.

20 posted on 09/20/2004 3:10:11 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson