[wideawake]

My real statement to the Times was that if hypothetically an individual in 2004 sat at a word processor and tried to create replicas of documents that they believed existed in 1972 or 1973, that could not change whatever the objective reality was of what George W. Bush was doing or not doing or where he was or wasn't at the times in question. My statement is such a plain truth that it hardly needed to be said.

This is the funniest thing I've read in days.

[liberlog]

This really is the funniest unintentionally funny, genuine statement I have read in years! Really.

[GaltMeister]

This is the funniest thing I've read in days.

No kidding.

"that could not change whatever the objective reality was of what George W. Bush was doing or not doing or where he was or wasn't at the times in question."

But they sure as hell forged some documents to attempt to 'prove'
"whatever the objective reality was of what George W. Bush was doing or not doing or where he was or wasn't at the times in question."

This whole thing is really starting to make me sick.

[justshutupandtakeit]

Couldn't try and create funnier stuff than that. Keep it up boys.

[Chode]

yeah... and he used a FORGED signature because???