Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Frank_Discussion
The question is energy density - time on target will be a problem. If the laser beam is powerful enough, then a very brief illumination of the target by the laser will be enough to damage it. Otherwise, the beam will have to be held on target, and that will be non-trivial.
19 posted on 09/20/2004 1:45:49 PM PDT by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Chemist_Geek

Based on B-Chan's comment above, staying on target may not be that difficult. Tie the flight controls into the turret targeting controls, you should be able to draw a bead and keep it there.

Beyond that, just lazing the enemy's sensor suite might be a good thing to be able to do.


24 posted on 09/20/2004 1:49:23 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Chemist_Geek
Otherwise, the beam will have to be held on target, and that will be non-trivial.
A closed-loop optical-sighting system involving the use of the laser itself is out of the realm of possibilities?

Couple a 'laser' to a micromachined "DMD device" (active steerable reflector) controlled in real-time and you're dang near there ...

61 posted on 09/20/2004 10:21:27 PM PDT by _Jim (s <--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson