Posted on 09/20/2004 12:33:39 PM PDT by Pharmboy
TRENTON, N.J. - Which is more harmful to your health — a smoky bar or a city street filled with diesel truck fumes? Well, you might want to skip your next happy hour.
Smoky bars and casinos have up to 50 times more cancer-causing particles in the air than highways and city streets clogged with diesel trucks at rush hour, according to a study that also shows indoor air pollution virtually disappears once smoking is banned.
Conducted by the researcher who first showed secondhand smoke causes thousands of U.S. lung cancer deaths each year, the study found casino and bar workers are exposed to particulate pollution at far greater levels than the government allows outdoors.
"This paper will help localities pass smoking bans," predicted the author, James Repace, a biophysicist who works as a secondhand-smoke consultant after spending 30 years as a federal researcher. "It shows how beneficial smoking bans are for hospitality workers and patrons."
Repace tested air in a casino, a pool hall and six taverns in Delaware in November 2002 and in January 2003, two months after the state imposed a strict indoor smoking ban.
His detectors measured two substances blamed for tobacco-related cancers: a group of chemicals called particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PPAHs, and respirable particles — airborne soot small enough to penetrate the lungs.
"They are the most dangerous" substances in secondhand smoke, said Repace, a visiting assistant clinical professor at Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston.
Repace said his research also showed that ventilation systems — sometimes touted by tavern, restaurant and casino groups as an alternative to smoking bans — cannot exchange air fast enough to keep up with the smoke.
The study, published in the September issue of the Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, was partly funded by the nation's largest philanthropic organization devoted to health care, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation of Plainsboro, N.J.
Repace found an average level of respirable particles of 231 micrograms, or millionths of a gram, per cubic meter of air in the eight nightspots in Delaware. That is 15 times the 15-microgram Environmental Protection Agency (news - web sites) limit for outdoor air, and 49 times the rush-hour average on Interstate 95 in Wilmington. It even tops the 199-microgram rush-hour level at the Baltimore Harbor Tunnel tollbooths.
The eight indoor places had an average PPAH level of 134 nanograms, or billionths of a gram, per cubic meter — five times the level in the air outside. By comparison, the average rush-hour levels of PPAHs on Interstate 95 in Wilmington and in Boston's Roxbury neighborhood, heavily polluted by diesel and truck emissions, were 7 and 18 nanograms, respectively.
After the smoking ban took effect, levels of both cancer-causing substances dropped 90 percent or more in all of the indoor places tested, with the air quality nearly indistinguishable from outside air.
"It demonstrates really clearly that a smoking ban results in a massive improvement in air quality," said Dr. Jonathan Foulds, director of the tobacco dependence program at University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey's School of Public Health. "Here in New Jersey, and in many other states that don't have an indoor smoking ban, this should be used to put pressure on the legislators."
Timothy Buckley, associate professor of environmental health science at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, said other research has shown dramatic air quality improvement after smoking was banned in workplaces, but this appears to be the first study in bars or casinos.
"The magnitude of that effect is striking," Buckley said.
As of July 1, a total of 727 U.S. municipalities had some smoking restrictions, with 312 banning smoking even in bars and restaurants, according to the nonprofit American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation.
Delaware, New York and Massachusetts prohibit smoking in all workplaces, restaurants and bars. California and Connecticut have similar bans, but with exemptions for workplaces with five or fewer employees.
___
On the Net:
American Nonsmokers' Rights Foundation: http://www.no-smoke.org
Because when you are trying to kill your liver, you want to make sure the lungs still work.
Coincidentally, researchers have also discovered that fire is hot and water is wet.
OH NO! I've been smoking and drinking on Interstates with big rigs rolling by! I am soooooop screwed!
Please file with author's previous work 'Women picked up in bar much uglier next morning', 'Phone numbers in rest rooms do not lead to expected results', and 'Why the %#$@ do you call it happy hour when I am so @$%^#ing miserable!'
REPACE ALERT!!!!!!!!!!
The Delaware paper (which we can't post articles from here) had a rehash of one of Repace's "studies" in Delaware in that rag today. It was funded by IMPACT Delaware - and anti group funded by.....(drum roll please) .......RWJF!!!!
Owl_Eagle
" WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH"
Lets just say I'm not concerned about my health when I go to a bar.
I vote we keep diesel trucks out of smoky bars.
You mean Brandie and Candie don't want to provide me with a good time?
No, Repace's "research" does no such thing. All it shows is that he will do and say exactly what his employer tells him to say.
RWJF is one of the largest ($$$$$$$) promoters of smoking bans (particularly in places selling alcohol) there is. RWJF also now controls MADD.
This guy is a charlatan.
Near I-81??
OH NO! I've been smoking and drinking on Interstates with big rigs rolling by! I am soooooo screwed!
Near I-81??Izzat you? Gimmee a light. I'll buy us a round.
Further efforts to lend legitimacy to telling private business owners what sort of clientele they can attract, and what sort of atmosphere they can have on their private property...
Conducted by the researcher who first showed secondhand smoke causes thousands of U.S. lung cancer deaths each year, the study found casino and bar workers are exposed to particulate pollution at far greater levels than the government allows outdoors.
Too funny, Laz--I'm LOLing here...
And, if you want to drive home drunk, you want both hands on the wheel, and not busied trying to smoke cigarettes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.