Posted on 09/20/2004 10:23:53 AM PDT by luknskill
***"The democrats would rather win the WH than the war." - Tom DeLay***
>>>
BTTT for defeating Communism in America.
that is indeed the best analogy our side can make - Kerry wants Iraq to be another Vietnam. Its all he knows, his Vietnam post-war antics was the credo that built his entire political career - and he would do it all over again in this war to attain the Presidency - and do the same thing to the soldiers and the country, that he and his ilk did in the 1970s.
"He offered his own four-point plan for handling the conflict: THAT's his big plan? Do more of what Bush is already doing?"
Ypu, that's it. I don't know if you were able to listen to the speech, but the 75% of it that called Bush a liar, a misleader, a mishandler, got an enormous reception. It got bit quieter when he continued with something beside immediate, unilateral withdrawal. This was an anti-war crowd all the way.
Kerry's idea of leadership:
..."...Provide benefits to the Iraqi people..."...
What tried and failed garbage--turn Iraq into a welfare client.
no, he will update that statement - its not genghis khan anymore, its Girls Gone Wild.
And the DUmmies are all hyped up over this speech. They are saying "Kerry just won the election with one speech!". As if anyone but the DUmmies was inspired by it.
Bump
They really think the American people believe he (Kerry) has an original thought of his own?
Kerry STILL stabs American soldiers in the back.
My hunch is that Kerry hates "the American soldier" because the American soldier reminds him of his own failings in Vietnam; the Vietnam war presented him with a test of manhood and somehow in some way, things went wrong. Ever since then, he's been trying to assert his manhood. Kerry's story is a sort of second rate version of Lord Jim...with a crappy, inglorious ending.
Saw that & it's just too darned early in the day for me to be laughing this hard!!
Will he claim to have put panties on his own head?
"He's killing Americans...he has a lot of blood on his hands."
How can we bring the Traitor to justice?
2: Kerry voted for use of military force in Iraq.
3: Kerry claimed the president was refusing to give our troops body armor and ammo, when it was Kerry who actually voted for the $87 million before he voted against it.
4: Two weeks ago, Kerry said that if he knew when he voted for the use of military force in Iraq, he WOULD STILL VOTE FOR MILITARY FORCE IN IRAQ.
5: Now he says the Iraq portion of the war on terrorism shouldn't have happened, after having said consistantly for 6 years that military force is needed in Iraq.
I wonder if Kerry has seen a doctor recently - he seems to have a severe case of hoof in mouth disease. For example, Kerry seems to be forgetting that Clinton also called for war with Iraq, an idea that Kerry thought was a good one at the time. And, he's forgetting that he actually voted FOR the war, before he started voting against it. And, he's ignoring the fact that we have already had lots of assistance from the international community in Iraq; that's why they're called COALITION forces. And he's overlooking the fact that he has stated that now that we are there, we need to stay there and finish the job.
All in all, it sounds as though Kerry uses SeeBS to vette his information for him.
Talk about wrong choices!!!!
Even an unoriginal thought would be something. He is without thought.
Make sure he's voted out. Then indict him. Then try him. Then whatever comes next... What were you thinking?
I'll bet your list hits 20 by Nov. 2...
True, how many people has he now gone thru to try to format a campaign message???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.