Posted on 09/20/2004 2:34:18 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
We're going to remember you said that!
Indeed we will!
When I heard the President's statement, I knew CBS would cave.
Democrats made similar attacks earlier this year. In April, Kerry referred to Bush as a president who "can't even answer whether or not he showed up for duty in the National Guard," and who "has yet to explain to America whether or not, and tell the truth, about whether he showed up for duty." In February, Kerry said he wanted answers about Bush's service in Alabama, saying "Just because you get an honorable discharge does not, in fact, answer that question."
Lost amid all the charges are the facts about Bush's time in the Guard. When did he serve? What did he do? Did he fulfill his responsibilities? Was he in Alabama? In the March 8, 2004, issue of National Review, Byron York investigated and found the answers. ***
First it's not Mr. Bush, it's PRESIDENT Bush. Second, to quote PRESIDENT Bush, "let the truth come out". Third, I hope Mr. Blather can take his Bixxh-slapping like man but somehow I don't think he can.
THEM DIDN'T "FALL FOR A HOAX" - THEY HATCHED THE SCHEME IN CAHOOTS WITH THE DNC --- and yes, I'm yelling.
"Sugar-coat" Is what the forged documents alledge Killian was asked to do, in regards to LT Bush's military performance.
"Sugar-coat" Is that what CBS will try and do, in regards to Dan's felonious report and cover-up?
I'd like to see this reporter fly a plane and then call it "cushy".
And there is STILL no evidence that he "wangled" anything.
CBS may "Sugar-coat" it, but I think they'll just baffle everyone with more outright BS.
"Mr. Kerry's team denies any connection to the documents -- "no ifs, ands or buts," spokesman David Wade said.
We're going to remember you said that!"
It all depends on how you define 'connections'
"Mr. Kerry has deliberately packaged himself as a war hero,"
Operative word is 'packaged'
The package was an empty one.
And a Canadian paper is qualified to judge this...how?
Ugh. This article was written from a hopelessly biased point of view.
Anyway, not that I like the conclusion, and in fact, I am surprized by it, but I don't believe that a crime has been committed.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1216465/posts?page=133#133 <-- read from #133
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1217992/posts?page=55#55 <-- Nos. 55,72,101,113
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1218457/posts <-- See #6 (by ScottFromSpokane)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1219685/posts?page=37#37 <--
As for CBS and Burkett, it is looking as though CBS and Dan Rather are going to do a mea culpa, and attempt to limit inquiry so it does not reach past Burkett.
Are you sure about that? There must be some way!.... Think!
B-w-a-a-h-a-a-ha-ha!
sKerry can only make himself look big, if the tears President Bush down.
It looks like we need to start parsing Danny-boy's words. This sounds like Clinton-speak "We knew they were fake; we just wish we had the real thing"
The same thing goes for the Democratic Party.
A lot of mush from Captian Dan the "news" man.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.