I read Pacepa's article (i.e., the post I was replying to) before posting. The only recent (i.e., within the last decade) reference in the entire piece was the in first and the last paragraphs.
Those also happened to be the shortest paragraphs.
You obviously conducted a cursory review to get the flavor of the piece, and then unleashed a barrage of (rehearsed) inuendo.
I read the piece, noted that everything save the first and last paragraphs predated the 1980s, let alone the 1990s or the 21st century, and commented accordingly.
Perhaps you should go back to the sandbox from which you came.
Actually, I should ask that you go back to whatever sandbox you came from, especially since you sound exactly like several previously banned "I'm-a-true-conservative-and-everyone-who-disagrees-with-me-is-a-commie" trolls I've crossed swords with.
Point out where the continuum ends regarding the relationship between Communism and Muhammadanism. The public record shows China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, Syria, Libya and most of the players that we see involved in the same activities today, and most notably since Sept. 11th, 2001. Of course Bush has thrown a wet blanket on a lot of it which has slowed the incrementalism (maybe), but terrororist orgs and 'reformed' Communists still work closely together, and lead me to believe the continuum is worthy of contemporary updating.