Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
BTW POOH-bah,

Your assertion that 99% of the report deals with the 1970s is pure BS. You obviously conducted a cursory review to get the flavor of the piece, and then unleashed a barrage of (rehearsed) inuendo. No conservative worth his salt behaves in this way. Perhaps you should go back to the sandbox from which you came.
38 posted on 09/19/2004 4:03:26 PM PDT by GIJoel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: GIJoel

Nice article, and the ones that follow on the thread support your contention that the old carried over into the new. I've been reading quite a bit about terrorism, including a book called "the Age of Sacred Terror" which totally skips the communist part in the roots of terror. It lays the blame on the Muslim Brotherhood, which it says resulted from purely religious discord between infidel muslim leaders and fundamentalist muslims in the 50's. The book is authored by two gentlemen that served in Clinton's NSC. (I know, I should have expected a half-true story). At any rate, your post has been an eye opener. Thanks.


40 posted on 09/19/2004 4:29:59 PM PDT by DC Bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: GIJoel
No conservative worth his salt behaves in this way. Perhaps you should go back to the sandbox from which you came.

You're either very perceptive, or you're just familiar with that poster. LOL.

88 posted on 09/20/2004 12:02:33 AM PDT by Joe Hadenuf (I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: GIJoel
Your assertion that 99% of the report deals with the 1970s is pure BS.

I read Pacepa's article (i.e., the post I was replying to) before posting. The only recent (i.e., within the last decade) reference in the entire piece was the in first and the last paragraphs.

Those also happened to be the shortest paragraphs.

You obviously conducted a cursory review to get the flavor of the piece, and then unleashed a barrage of (rehearsed) inuendo.

I read the piece, noted that everything save the first and last paragraphs predated the 1980s, let alone the 1990s or the 21st century, and commented accordingly.

Perhaps you should go back to the sandbox from which you came.

Actually, I should ask that you go back to whatever sandbox you came from, especially since you sound exactly like several previously banned "I'm-a-true-conservative-and-everyone-who-disagrees-with-me-is-a-commie" trolls I've crossed swords with.

94 posted on 09/20/2004 3:59:34 AM PDT by Poohbah (If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson