Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexual Acts Defy Design Of The Body, Immunological Journal Finds
NARTH ^ | June 9, 2004 | Frank York

Posted on 09/19/2004 1:23:19 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist

Susan Brinkman, an investigative journalist, is currently writing a six-part series on homosexuality called "Homosexuality: The Untold Story - A Dangerous New Diversity," for the Catholic Standard & Times, the Archdiocese newspaper of Philadelphia.

In part 3 of her series on the health consequences of homosexual behavior, Brinkmann writes: "The American public has been left largely in the dark about the extent of the medical problems associated with homosexual activity because of the influence of pro-homosexual political agendas.

Brinkmann also notes that a high number of homosexuals appear to have been molested as children as compared to the general population. In one study, the American Journal of Public Health found that 39% of males who have same-sex attraction had been abused by homosexual men.

The author notes that from "an immunological point of view, the body itself considers homosexual acts to be disordered. For instance...substances in seminal fluid...send out 'signals' that are only understood by the female body. When deposited elsewhere, these signals are not only misunderstood, but cause sperm to fuse with whatever somatic body cell they encounter. This fusing often results in the development of cancerous malignancies. (See "Sexual Behavior and Increased Anal Cancer," Immunological and Cell Biology 75 (1977); 181-183.)

(Excerpt) Read more at narth.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abnormal; gaus; gay; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; homsexual; narth; turdburglars; uphillgardners; youcantputthatthere
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-310 next last
To: Southern62
Ummmm.. I'm almost afraid to ask but I have too - what's up with the bleach??

Kills any HIV.

261 posted on 09/20/2004 4:55:32 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: SunnySide
You too seem VERY confused in a John Kerryish manner. Void of any logic.

Now, I'm just too "nuanced" for you.

262 posted on 09/20/2004 5:00:03 PM PDT by LogicWings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: SunnySide
In the final analysis you're the one who doesn't know what they are talking about. Your posts are riddled with contradictions.

You appear incapable of doing anything other than hurling ad hominem attacks.

Nice debating style, I'm really impressed.

263 posted on 09/20/2004 5:03:49 PM PDT by LogicWings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: LogicWings

"Now, I'm just too "nuanced" for you." = GAY! Possibly with Graves Disease

whatever


264 posted on 09/20/2004 5:07:23 PM PDT by SunnySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: SunnySide
Possibly with Graves Disease

whatever

Yeah, whatever,
Care to sink a little lower before you give up altogether?

265 posted on 09/20/2004 5:18:09 PM PDT by LogicWings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

I just lost my appetite.


266 posted on 09/20/2004 6:30:43 PM PDT by diamond6 (Everyone who is for abortion has already been born. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LogicWings

logicWings, "Ok, time to get in a whole bunch of trouble here. This subject brings out all my multiple personalities.

LogicWings,"Yeah, whatever,
Care to sink a little lower before you give up altogether?"

No, you and your troubled multiple personalities manage to sink lower altogether with out any assistance. Carry on fool.


267 posted on 09/20/2004 7:51:07 PM PDT by SunnySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: SunnySide
Carry on fool.

Ahh, you could sink lower.
I've lost count of the ad hominem attacks.

268 posted on 09/20/2004 8:09:18 PM PDT by LogicWings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

There are those that would have us believe that it is a "lifestyle choice", or an "alternative lifestyle, while simultaneously arguing that gays are "born that way".


269 posted on 09/22/2004 9:37:21 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stinkerpot65

LOL! What a pic.

Yet they feel no shame, do they?


270 posted on 09/22/2004 9:38:46 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Oakleaf

Yes, I remember when this disease came out being labeled as GRID.... and the name was changed so fast to AIDS it could make ones head spin.


271 posted on 09/22/2004 9:40:16 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: wildbill

Some speculate that the rapid transmission of this disease into the general population wasn't from intravenous drug use, but rather through bisexuals. Even the CDC declared that bisexuals were a bridge of transmission of HIV to heterosexual women.


272 posted on 09/22/2004 9:43:57 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: QuodErat

The figure of 4000% came from the online newssource Between the Lines. Supposedly a gay newspaper in Michigan.


273 posted on 09/22/2004 9:46:27 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

Probvlem is, that many homosexual acts ened up causing diseases that are pertinent to the gay community. From there they invariably spread via bisexuals. This is well documented.


274 posted on 09/22/2004 9:47:56 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: scripter

No problem, Scripter.


275 posted on 09/22/2004 9:48:19 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Cogadh na Sith
"Hmmmmm. Much like fake memos, fake science doesn't convince anyone. Just'cuz you want to believe it doesn't make it true."

Fake science. Don't think so. This information comes from a well respected journal.

...Just because you don't want to accept this information, doesn't mean that it isn't so.
276 posted on 09/22/2004 9:53:02 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

Problem is, the HIV virus is smaller in size than the microscopic holes that are within the wall lining of even the best of condoms. No condom is totally fail-safe.


277 posted on 09/22/2004 9:54:46 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
"RE: Headline"

"Gee, ya think?"

That post was well, I say, most enlightening. Thank you for your added input....
278 posted on 09/22/2004 9:58:59 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: eno_

The correlation of the cycle of abuse and homosexuality is being made more and more apparent with each passing year or two.


279 posted on 09/22/2004 10:01:03 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
"For instance...substances in seminal fluid...send out 'signals' that are only understood by the female body. When deposited elsewhere, these signals are not only misunderstood, but cause sperm to fuse with whatever somatic body cell they encounter. This fusing often results in the development of cancerous malignancies."

I thought sperm cells only had one half of the total number of chromosones in a human cell. A human egg also has one half of the total number of chromosones in a human cell. The sperm and egg merge and the zygote has a full number of human chromosones.

So then how would this person explain a sperm cell with half the number of human chromosones merging with a human cell with a full number of chromosones? An answer of "that's what causes cancer" is not a valid scientific explanation as even cancer cells have no more chromosones than a normal human cell.

I'm also wondering what bio-chemistry findings this woman has to back her up her claims and just why these "signals" are not understood and why (i.e. what enzymes or other chemical is present in a female that's not present in a male.

The writer sounds like she just threw out what she thinks happens without any clinical research. There is nothing in the references that support any of this. From a scientific perspective, this is shoddy work.

I know I'm not the only one that caught the bit about sperm merging with other human cells.

280 posted on 09/22/2004 10:06:13 AM PDT by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-310 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson