Posted on 09/19/2004 1:23:19 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
Susan Brinkman, an investigative journalist, is currently writing a six-part series on homosexuality called "Homosexuality: The Untold Story - A Dangerous New Diversity," for the Catholic Standard & Times, the Archdiocese newspaper of Philadelphia.
In part 3 of her series on the health consequences of homosexual behavior, Brinkmann writes: "The American public has been left largely in the dark about the extent of the medical problems associated with homosexual activity because of the influence of pro-homosexual political agendas.
Brinkmann also notes that a high number of homosexuals appear to have been molested as children as compared to the general population. In one study, the American Journal of Public Health found that 39% of males who have same-sex attraction had been abused by homosexual men.
The author notes that from "an immunological point of view, the body itself considers homosexual acts to be disordered. For instance...substances in seminal fluid...send out 'signals' that are only understood by the female body. When deposited elsewhere, these signals are not only misunderstood, but cause sperm to fuse with whatever somatic body cell they encounter. This fusing often results in the development of cancerous malignancies. (See "Sexual Behavior and Increased Anal Cancer," Immunological and Cell Biology 75 (1977); 181-183.)
(Excerpt) Read more at narth.com ...
Almost without exception, the gay men I know (and that's too many to count) have a story of some kind of sexual trauma or abuse in their childhood - molestation by a parent or authority figure, or seduction as an adolescent at the hands of an adult.
There was a study done several thousand years ago concerning homosexuals: "You shall not lie with a male as with a women. It is an abomination". (Lev. 18:22)
Wow.
How sad. The only thing that I can hope for is that now since the gay culture is more "out there", less men will be pressured by culture to get married, and thereby abuse their own children, or their children's children. They can just go on abusing one another.
The smoking example is fallacious. Your lungs are made to take in air. The anus is not designed to have things going in it.
Or heterosexual IV drug users.
And I would be gone as well. This is a family site - pro-family and pushing the homosexual agenda isn't tolerated. She was probably a returning banned poster.
"How sad. The only thing that I can hope for is that now since the gay culture is more "out there", they can just go on abusing one another."
It's true but don't expect any queer militants to admit the queer abuse on queer which exists. They want to keep painting fabricated pictures of normalcy, tolerance and equality within their own twisted environment.
They Can't admit the facts because I suspect they are patholigical liars in denial. Sad!
They are responsable for 75% of all the HIV/AIDS cases in the US even though they only repersent 2-10% of the populace. That's a RED FLAG if I ever seen one. Wonder why PBS won't do a "documentary" on the subject?
Thank you for the correction, ref. Mosaic law, but I only intended to direct your attention to the Bible, which trumps any study man could come up with.
I totally agree. They are in total denial. If it was hereditary, it would probably have mostly bred out of the society by now.
Religion aside, the Ancient world considered homosexual behavior a choice and not a "born" thing.
They also used homosexuality to argue that conquered kings had no heirs to claim the throne because their "homosexual behavior" precluded it. This was usually after teh king and queen and concubines were killed.
Indeed. It's a choice but not in the strict definition of the word. Homosexuality (behavior) is always a choice, but homosexual tendencies are something different. It's complicated. The good news is the growing number of former homosexuals is slowly being reported. Well, it would be better news if it was reported more often...
If there was a "gay gene" it could very well be recessive. Straight people could be carriers for the gene, sort of like how brown-haired people can be carriers for a blond gene.
Didn't twin studies pretty much disprove the idea of homosexuality being hereditary?
All the more reason homosexual behavior should not be protected by the government. It's wrong, immoral, sick and always ends in death.
I have no idea. I'm just pointing out that if homosexuality is genetic, it would still survive in the gene pool even if homosexuals did not have kids (of course, homosexuals do have kids with straight people and, these days, through artificial insemination).
If homosexuality isn't genetic and is a learned behavior, that begs the question: how did homosexuality start?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.