John Kerry has a plan...
Posted on 09/19/2004 7:55:54 AM PDT by kattracks
It's the last stand of Gunga Dan. But like other messianic types - George Custer comes to mind - Dan Rather is not going down alone. He seems hellbent on taking CBS News with him and damaging the press everywhere.Memogate is now Rathergate. Journalists not yet born will one day hear the story of how the highest flyer in TV news flamed out while chasing a "gotcha" story.
Rather, 72, always saw himself as a role model for journalists. But instead of being Revered Elder Statesman, he's sealing his fate as Exhibit A on how not to handle a hot story and the fallout. How sad. Suicide always is, even the professional kind.
The man who succeeded Uncle Walter Cronkite in 1981 is wound tighter than a tick in a yo-yo, but Rather's oddball quirks have peacefully coexisted with his talent.
He's got train-wreck charisma, zanily captured by the stranger who pummeled him, demanding, "What's the frequency, Kenneth?" But there was principle, too, and Rather often used it to stand up for news values in a business dominated by cheap entertainment tricks.
That's what makes his performance on the Bush National Guard story such a personal disaster. But that's his problem. Ours is making sure we learn the dangers of burning too hot for a story in an election where the media's credibility is taking a beating.
CBS' document mess is the biggest whopper of them all, for Rather was the Pied Piper for a long list of press followers. More than 50 newspapers across the U.S., including The New York Times and the Daily News, published articles citing the now-questionable CBS documents as proof Bush got favored treatment 30 years ago.
That total counts just Sept. 9, the day after Rather's initial report on "60 Minutes." CBS touted the show in a press release on Sept. 8 and posted the memos on its Web site.
The "scoop" was huge, and so is the stain, which is why Rather has an obligation to stop defending the indefensible. Here are the three blunders he and CBS made:
- They never should have gone with the story in the first place. Since it aired, three of the "experts" the network said authenticated the documents have cast doubts on them. Two said they warned CBS it needed more proof.
- When questions surfaced, CBS first trotted out the tired "we stand by our story" defense while desperately searching for people who would back it up. Rather and network flacks are still making the astonishing claim that the "heart" of the story is true even if the documents are fake. Yeah, the operation was a success, but the patient died.
- The third blunder is Rather's alone, and it is the most shameful. In interviews, he has sounded like a crooked pol caught with his hand in the cookie jar. He told The Wall Street Journal that critics are "raising questions about the documents because they can't deny the fundamental truths of the analysis."
To The Washington Post, he played macho man: "I don't cave when the pressure gets too great from these partisan political ideological forces."
Such comments are unforgivable smears. As Bernard Goldberg, a former CBS correspondent and now critic, put it, "Dan Rather is acting like Richard Nixon."
As legacies go, that's not one Rather wanted. But he's earned it.
Originally published on September 19, 2004
About time someone DID... CBS, NBS, and ABS and even PBS.. are apples in the same barrel brewing a funcky moldy cider.. Well past time for disinfectant...
RAthER: "I'm not a journalist, but I play one on TV."
Rather has never gotten over how Bush 41 bitchslapped the hell out of him during an interview back in '88.
Danny boy's been a mess ever since.
See why we need "stem cell research'?
The LSM just found it's poster boy for the job.
Dan the 'RAT-herrrrrrr' victim of Alzheimers!
then again, RATS make good scientific test models. Now there's one for the Gipper!
John Kerry has a plan...
The MSM is ONLY doing this story because they percive it a blow to their own prestige and credibility...They are not yet ready to say Rather KNEW the documents were frauds or that he knew his sources were far from unimpeachable.
He should have done more fact checking, had the documents thoroughly examined, talked to people who didn't hate Bush...but he had so much in common with the Bush haters, was so biased, so arrogant that he went blind and deaf and stupid...
Mapes is toast...Rather's credibility is toast...but he will linger on awhile.
LOL. . .For sure; and longer. . .
ROTFLMPO ... THAT has to be the best Groucho I've seen in a LOOooong time.!!!
/
Despite the common implication that Nixon was responsible, that episode is not known as Nixongate, but Watergate.
Just because this is going to be known as Rathergate or some such, does not necessarily mean that he will be noted in history as the major actor in the episode.
Was Rather DEEP THROAT???
Only the shadow knows
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.