Just to Chime in and say your observation is at the heart of the question that is effecting this election.
Should we as informed individuals continue to support or allow individuals that clearly have agendas that drive their world view away from reality?
I worked in D.C. for 10 years and became somewhat used to having to be PC in many discussions (just to avoid wrath and be civil), rather than being honest.
It is difficult to honestly discuss these issues with liberals. I really do not like being called a hateful person, just because my view of life is based on Scriptures and not on the personal feelings of a few fringe elements.
The times when I did speak up, it was evident my career would become affected, so silence in the workplace was a prudent choice (for me).
It seemed every month we celebrated some new neglected people group.
Several of the groups were so highly considered, that members were granted time away from work, with pay, to attend their events.
We had NOBLE, Natl' Organization of Blacks in Law Enforcement. Then we had WIFLE, Women in Federal Law Enforcement.
I was trying to start up a new group called SNIFFLE -
Several Neglected Insignificant Fat Fellows in Law Enforcement.
Hey, we are a people group too!!
- intellectual immaturity is a major factor in liberal reasoning. The use of drugs arrests the development of intellect. These old hippies and younger drug users are in fact intellectually immature. They will never get over their collective disability.