Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Flip-flop’ faces new attacks as former wife beats cancer (KERRY UPDATE)
The Sunday Times ^ | September 19, 2004 | Sarah Baxter

Posted on 09/19/2004 1:21:23 AM PDT by MadIvan

IT HAS been one of the best-kept secrets of the presidential election campaign. Julia Thorne, the first wife of John Kerry, the Democrat candidate, has been suffering from cancer.

After months of treatment out of the public eye, she has now been declared cancer-free and has returned to her home in Montana.

Thorne is considering writing a book about her experience of illness, but not until after the November election. “She is somebody who has written books before and has a lot to share with people,” a family friend said.

If the past is a guide, she may include some acerbic thoughts on the political campaign. Thorne, who married Kerry in 1970 and divorced in 1988, so hated being a political wife that she became severely depressed.

“I associated politics only with anger, loneliness and fear,” she wrote in her 1996 book on divorce, A Change of Heart.

In another book, on depression, she described how she had contemplated suicide. “Five months after my 36th birthday, my mind ravaged by corroding voices, my body defeated by bone-rattling panics, I sat on the edge of my bed minutes from taking my own life.”

Kerry’s bid for the White House brought the press back to her door, but while daughters Alexandra and Vanessa Kerry took to campaigning with gusto, Thorne, 60, remained out of the limelight. Her cancer treatment, which began last November at an East Coast hospital, went unreported.

“She has been enormously stressed and very grateful that people have respected her privacy,” her friend added. Thorne will still have to return to hospital for check-ups.

A spokesman for the Kerry campaign said Alexandra, 30, and Vanessa, 27, had “plenty of opportunities to spend time with their mom”, despite their hectic political schedule. “They are very pleased that she is doing so well.”

The mainstream media have kept their distance from Kerry’s personal life and, in particular, his marriage to Thorne. Like his second wife, Teresa Heinz Kerry, she was an heiress: her family was worth an estimated $300m. Her twin brother David Thorne was Kerry’s best friend at Yale University.

Some right-wing commentators have made hay with Kerry’s relationships, however. One of the most biting, Ann Coulter, has blasted the candidate as “just a gigolo”, “living off other men’s money by marrying their wives and daughters”.

Republican dirty tricks may intensify now that Thorne has recovered from her illness. On Rush Limbaugh’s hugely popular and ultra-conservative radio show, an advertisement about the candidate’s “flip-flops” — a persistent Republican theme — dominates most commercial breaks. The ad purports to sell anti-Kerry playing cards but is really an excuse to knock the candidate before an audience of millions.

To the theme tune of Flipper, the film about a dolphin, the narrator goes straight for the jugular: “He flip-flopped on his marriage of 18 years . . .” then turns to alleged “flip-flops” on policy.

Long after his divorce, Kerry went on to annul his marriage to Thorne in deference to his second wife, a Catholic. While Thorne did not contest the annulment, believing her husband had the right to remarry, she made no secret of her bitterness about the procedure.

“It was disrespectful to me, it was aloof to any emotional issues and devoid of any sense of the humanity of what this means to me and the children,” said Thorne.

Friends have been reluctant to revisit this episode out of loyalty to Thorne and political support for Kerry. In one of her few public comments, Thorne herself has said she is backing Kerry 100% for the presidency.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: firstwife; insensitivity; juliathorne; kerry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: maryz

Funny as hell, didn't someone say that Kerry might have been dishonorably discharged and then waited for a few years so he could re-instate papers so he could look like he was honorably discharged? Seems like the same situation here folks.


21 posted on 09/19/2004 2:39:56 AM PDT by 1FASTGLOCK45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
On Rush Limbaugh’s hugely popular and ultra-conservative radio show

What would someone to the right of Rush be considered?

22 posted on 09/19/2004 2:41:18 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hershey

Not to defend Kerry. But he's not the only one who's married someone for money. Believe me, there are tons of other people who do this to. I'm sure you can find tons of both Democrats and Republicans who do this. People who are known and not known.


23 posted on 09/19/2004 2:44:40 AM PDT by Lori675
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

What would someone to the right of Rush be considered?

NeoCon


24 posted on 09/19/2004 2:45:33 AM PDT by Lori675
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lori675

Also, Teresa Heinz has a prenup with Kerry. If she passes away, all the Heinz money goes to her kids not Kerry.


25 posted on 09/19/2004 2:50:10 AM PDT by Lori675
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
So, what questions/attacks were held back do to Kerry's wife #1 having cancer?

What new "attacks" are to appear because she's clear of cancer?

26 posted on 09/19/2004 2:50:52 AM PDT by endthematrix (Where is that number for FReeper addiction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Annulment greatly wounded my son's stepson. This is an unbelievable practice, especially if it is for money.


27 posted on 09/19/2004 3:15:45 AM PDT by tkathy (There will be no world peace until all thuggocracies are gone from the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

"What would someone to the right of Rush be considered?"

That would be almost any Democrat of forty years ago.


28 posted on 09/19/2004 3:21:10 AM PDT by RipSawyer ("Embed" Michael Moore with the 82nd airborne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

Julia Thorne can't be too angry with Kerry. I saw her brother on TV this week, defending Kerry. He is working on Kerry's campaign campaign.
Her brother was saying that Steve Pitkin was a liar...


29 posted on 09/19/2004 3:34:18 AM PDT by somerville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Senator Kerry maintains the lid on the reporting of his prostate cancer that was diagnosed and treated some 18 months ago. He refuses to release medical records and claims a complete cure on the basis of his physicians's findings.


30 posted on 09/19/2004 3:40:35 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capricam; Prime Choice

There is a difference between a legal annulment and a church annulment. Catholic annulment does NOT mean that the children from the marriage are illegitimate. It means that there was some spiritual impediment that prevented a true union from taking place. It has no bearing on the legitimacy of the children.

That could mean that one member of the couple was under age. It could mean that one member of the couple harbaored reservations about the marriage -- spoken, or unspoken. it could mean that one member of the couple did not intend to enter into a Catholic marriage, i.e. that one member of the couple did not intend to welcome children into the union. It could mean that one member of the couple all along thought that divorce was an option if things did not work out.

There are many other reasons that can be brought before the church tribunal in a petition for an annulment. Some of the requirements are statements from witnesses who know the couple before and after their marriage, as well as from the parents of both husband and the wife.


31 posted on 09/19/2004 4:09:59 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic (Re-elect Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: maryz

The church will not even CONSIDER annulment until the civil divorce is complete.


32 posted on 09/19/2004 4:15:08 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic (Re-elect Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
By paying a priest enough money...

A common misconception. My daughter's annulment cost about $200 and those fees were for the paperwork and the time of a church lawyer to help her through the process.

33 posted on 09/19/2004 4:17:25 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic (Re-elect Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
In another book, on depression, she described how she had contemplated suicide. “Five months after my 36th birthday, my mind ravaged by corroding voices, my body defeated by bone-rattling panics, I sat on the edge of my bed minutes from taking my own life.”

That's what being around John Kerry will do to a person. Explains a lot about Teresa's psychological imbalances.

34 posted on 09/19/2004 4:27:23 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capricam
How the hell can you annul a marriage that produced two kids?

that's easy.... be a catholic in Massachusettes with lots of money... you know, the same church that covered up the homosexual priests by taking money from parishoners and paying off lawyers and families.

jeez, didn't you know that the church can't be corrupted? Kennedy, Kerry, Cuomo=good catholic

Mel Gibson, heterosexual males, conservative= bad Catholics

simple

35 posted on 09/19/2004 5:13:35 AM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Capricam

"How the hell can you annul a marriage that produced two kids"?

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$...
and... FAVORS!

LLS


36 posted on 09/19/2004 5:32:40 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: leadpenny

"What would someone to the right of Rush be considered"?

Uhhh, a Buchananite? ;-)

LLS


38 posted on 09/19/2004 5:37:59 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"I associated politics only with anger, loneliness and fear"

Life with Jean-Fraude...one would be led to conclude that this is his approach/attitude to his lifes work.

39 posted on 09/19/2004 5:45:56 AM PDT by Ed_in_NJ ((considering upgrading to pajamas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
What would someone to the right of Rush be considered?

Sane!

40 posted on 09/19/2004 5:56:01 AM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson