Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Flip-flop’ faces new attacks as former wife beats cancer (KERRY UPDATE)
The Sunday Times ^ | September 19, 2004 | Sarah Baxter

Posted on 09/19/2004 1:21:23 AM PDT by MadIvan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: maryz

Funny as hell, didn't someone say that Kerry might have been dishonorably discharged and then waited for a few years so he could re-instate papers so he could look like he was honorably discharged? Seems like the same situation here folks.


21 posted on 09/19/2004 2:39:56 AM PDT by 1FASTGLOCK45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
On Rush Limbaugh’s hugely popular and ultra-conservative radio show

What would someone to the right of Rush be considered?

22 posted on 09/19/2004 2:41:18 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hershey

Not to defend Kerry. But he's not the only one who's married someone for money. Believe me, there are tons of other people who do this to. I'm sure you can find tons of both Democrats and Republicans who do this. People who are known and not known.


23 posted on 09/19/2004 2:44:40 AM PDT by Lori675
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

What would someone to the right of Rush be considered?

NeoCon


24 posted on 09/19/2004 2:45:33 AM PDT by Lori675
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lori675

Also, Teresa Heinz has a prenup with Kerry. If she passes away, all the Heinz money goes to her kids not Kerry.


25 posted on 09/19/2004 2:50:10 AM PDT by Lori675
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
So, what questions/attacks were held back do to Kerry's wife #1 having cancer?

What new "attacks" are to appear because she's clear of cancer?

26 posted on 09/19/2004 2:50:52 AM PDT by endthematrix (Where is that number for FReeper addiction?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Annulment greatly wounded my son's stepson. This is an unbelievable practice, especially if it is for money.


27 posted on 09/19/2004 3:15:45 AM PDT by tkathy (There will be no world peace until all thuggocracies are gone from the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

"What would someone to the right of Rush be considered?"

That would be almost any Democrat of forty years ago.


28 posted on 09/19/2004 3:21:10 AM PDT by RipSawyer ("Embed" Michael Moore with the 82nd airborne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

Julia Thorne can't be too angry with Kerry. I saw her brother on TV this week, defending Kerry. He is working on Kerry's campaign campaign.
Her brother was saying that Steve Pitkin was a liar...


29 posted on 09/19/2004 3:34:18 AM PDT by somerville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Senator Kerry maintains the lid on the reporting of his prostate cancer that was diagnosed and treated some 18 months ago. He refuses to release medical records and claims a complete cure on the basis of his physicians's findings.


30 posted on 09/19/2004 3:40:35 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capricam; Prime Choice

There is a difference between a legal annulment and a church annulment. Catholic annulment does NOT mean that the children from the marriage are illegitimate. It means that there was some spiritual impediment that prevented a true union from taking place. It has no bearing on the legitimacy of the children.

That could mean that one member of the couple was under age. It could mean that one member of the couple harbaored reservations about the marriage -- spoken, or unspoken. it could mean that one member of the couple did not intend to enter into a Catholic marriage, i.e. that one member of the couple did not intend to welcome children into the union. It could mean that one member of the couple all along thought that divorce was an option if things did not work out.

There are many other reasons that can be brought before the church tribunal in a petition for an annulment. Some of the requirements are statements from witnesses who know the couple before and after their marriage, as well as from the parents of both husband and the wife.


31 posted on 09/19/2004 4:09:59 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic (Re-elect Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: maryz

The church will not even CONSIDER annulment until the civil divorce is complete.


32 posted on 09/19/2004 4:15:08 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic (Re-elect Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ichneumon
By paying a priest enough money...

A common misconception. My daughter's annulment cost about $200 and those fees were for the paperwork and the time of a church lawyer to help her through the process.

33 posted on 09/19/2004 4:17:25 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic (Re-elect Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
In another book, on depression, she described how she had contemplated suicide. “Five months after my 36th birthday, my mind ravaged by corroding voices, my body defeated by bone-rattling panics, I sat on the edge of my bed minutes from taking my own life.”

That's what being around John Kerry will do to a person. Explains a lot about Teresa's psychological imbalances.

34 posted on 09/19/2004 4:27:23 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capricam
How the hell can you annul a marriage that produced two kids?

that's easy.... be a catholic in Massachusettes with lots of money... you know, the same church that covered up the homosexual priests by taking money from parishoners and paying off lawyers and families.

jeez, didn't you know that the church can't be corrupted? Kennedy, Kerry, Cuomo=good catholic

Mel Gibson, heterosexual males, conservative= bad Catholics

simple

35 posted on 09/19/2004 5:13:35 AM PDT by Dick Vomer (liberals suck......... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Capricam

"How the hell can you annul a marriage that produced two kids"?

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$...
and... FAVORS!

LLS


36 posted on 09/19/2004 5:32:40 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: leadpenny

"What would someone to the right of Rush be considered"?

Uhhh, a Buchananite? ;-)

LLS


38 posted on 09/19/2004 5:37:59 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"I associated politics only with anger, loneliness and fear"

Life with Jean-Fraude...one would be led to conclude that this is his approach/attitude to his lifes work.

39 posted on 09/19/2004 5:45:56 AM PDT by Ed_in_NJ ((considering upgrading to pajamas))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
What would someone to the right of Rush be considered?

Sane!

40 posted on 09/19/2004 5:56:01 AM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson