Posted on 09/18/2004 8:16:45 PM PDT by John Lenin
The bastards in the Log Cabin Republicans also refused to endorse Bush. I hope he wins big, and tells the buggerers to shove off after the election.
Exactly, the Log Cabin republicans were as fake as a Dan Rather newscast.
If they are conservative on fiscal issues, yet LIBERAL on prime social issues, such as social acceptance of their homosexuality, they ought to be honest with themselves, and LEAVE THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, and join the Libertarians. Shame on them for their antics in New York City.
"...evoked panic and precaution behind the Capitol’s closed doors..."
THAT explains why homosexuality is considered to be a SECURITY RISK and theyre are barred from holding jobs that require honor integrity and trust.
We cannot have psychologically defective deviants in positions that would divulge information critical to our national security.
We had rules like that in place BEFORE the clintonista perverts sullied our nation. We need to get them all back - and by the looks of the shut down of our insecure weapons labs, the BUSH W.H. is cleaning up the trash left from the last decade.
History has shown though, that it only takes a very small, VERY dedicated number to cause great changes given the right circumstances. Look what the Bolsheviks did, for instance.
The homosexual activists could leave the Republican Party. But then they want to force you to associate with them and hire them, while Libertarians--to their credit--believe in freedom of association. It'd be best for the activists to just repent and get with God's program!
Not to be nit-picky, but its actually a good thing that the APA removed homosexuality from the DSM. Homosexuality, is not a pathology, it is a perverse choice. Individuals choose to violate the laws of nature, and the laws of God and instead seek to pursue their own devious and destructive ends. By classifying homosexuality as a disorder of the brain, you give homosexuals an excuse: "we can't help it", etc. The overriding point, however, regarding the coordinated social revolution toward homosexual rights, is well taken.
As a side note, the whole idea of "fiscally conservative/socially liberal" is ridiculous. Fiscal conservatives fight to keep government small, and social liberals, by definition, fight to increase government. The two are mutually exclusive.
The central thesis of gay liberation is that you should be able to have sex with whomever you want, whenever you want, without penalty.
The reason the gays are carrying the day is because this thesis has proven very, very popular with straights.
Anyone who knows his Bible should not be surprised at the rush to Sodom and Gomorrah-this is a recurring feature of human history, as are the consequences.
homosexuals=cultural terrorists
So, I'm new, but there are no gay folks posting on here? Truly, that lifestyle and these opinons are mutally exclusive?
I agree, socially liberal ? I used to be socially liberal, than I grew up and looked at all the damage that was done to people who bought into that thinking.
No, that's way out of reality. Eighty percent of the U.S. media isn't gay; if you really believe that, you don't know many reporters.
And most Americans are exposed everyday to at least talk radio, and/or Fox News, and/or the internet. It's not your grandmother's world.
There never was a health care crises in this country. When the discussion came up, polls showed 89% were happy with their health care coverage. The socialists created the chaos. It became a manufactured crises. They sent out the lawyers, and health care has become so expensive, socialized medicine is the only way to save us from it - "for our own good".
I think it is a shame that the Republicans have written off gays. I do not think it is a perversion but a pathology. Govvernment should keep its nose out of our bedrooms. There are decent gays as there are decent Jews and Blacks and Christians and Hindus and Tutsies etc. What a waste of negative energy that would be better spent on the enemy. Gays are not the enemy.
They are not socialists, they are totalitarians.
I would not worry about them. It is not like they are going to have shitloads of kids to spread their lifestyle to. All they are going to have is (see above line word 4, insert here).
Louisiana Passing One Man/One Woman Marriage AdmendmentWith 3,781 of 4,124 precincts in it is:
For 569,672 (79%)
Against 154,154 (21%)
Missouri was 71-29 for their amendment
The poor people of Massachusetts were dictated to. They had no say.
Closeted homosexuals are a security risk. Just like Clinton was an enormous security risk because of his reckless sexual behavior: anyone aware of his behavior was in a position to blackmail him.
However, openly gay individuals are no longer considered a security risk, at least by the National Security Agency. The NSA will hire homosexuals and give them the highest security classification. They value talent as long as the individual is not in a position to be blackmailed or compromised. The NSA even has a social group called GLOBE (Gay, Lesbian or Bisexual Employees). This according to the reporter James Bamfield, author of Body of Secrets and The Puzzle Palace.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.