Replies

My repost from another thread:

Over the last few days, there have been many theories about the origin of the memos. Starting with the question of why do such a bad job on the forgeries, some have argued a Rove sting operation, some have argued a DNC operation, directed by the Clintons to discredit the Kerry campaign, and others such as myself have said that this was a Kerry campaign operation all the way.

I now want to revise my theory a bit.IMHO, the political dynamics of this are much more complicated than meets the eye. I have noticed statements by demo political consultants and pundits speaking to the disarray and power struggle within the Kerry campaign. I believe somebody, perhaps Mary Ann Marsh, said "its all about money". That seemed odd to me at the time, but now its all starting to make sense.

I think what we are seeing is a power struggle within the demo party. In effect, there are three DNC groups. One is controlled by the Kennedy wing of the demo party, one is controlled by the Clintonista group, and one emerging group is the far left radical group controlled by people like George Soros. Soros has dumped a pile of money into this campaign, and he wants results, but more importantly, control. The Tides foundations, controlled by TA-RAY-ZA has given money to far left groups. Kerry's record, starting with the Senate testimony, has been decidedly anti-American and far to the left end of the demo party.

With Dean rising in the primaries, the Kennedy and Clinton groups conspired to take Dean out of the race. Dean, I believe, was the Soros wings first choice. Think of Kerry as a compromise candidate who had the backing of the Soros, Kennedy, and Clinton camps. Remember how Kerry initially wanted to take out McAwfull. That was the beginnings of the power struggle. The Clinton camp very cleverly set up Kerry for failure (using their mole advisers) at the convention with the dopey Vietnam bit.They had no need to instigate this memogate campaign, as they wouldn't want to discredit a major liberal media outlet, and Kerry was on his way out already with the Swift Vets.

The Soros wing however, due to the money influence, set up memogate with the full cooperation of the Kerry campaign. They enlisted all the crackpots and rabid Bush haters they could find as willing accomplices. Rather and CBS were prime candidates. They are not interested in Hillary in 08. they are concerned with destroying Bush, and building a powerful coalition far left group. This group will have a significant Communist and other fringe nihilistic influence. Mark my words, I agree with Savage, Soros is the most dangerous figure on the scene today. He has the money to influence a major corporation, such as Viacom. Sumner Redstone would not be taking Viacom down the rathole with CBS unless significant financial influence was being applied. Consider how much money can be brought to bear with the likes of
Soros' many companies and front organizations
Heinz Kerry and the many pension funds and other organizations she controls
Union Pension funds controlled by far left people such as John Sweeny.

Let us all FOLLOW THE MONEY.

Kerry is just a front man for a dangerous coalition of far left groups who want to take the US down a new road. The Clintons, on the other hand, while certainly leftists, are more concerned with personal power and are more pragmatic in applying that power. Soros is mentally unstable, as is Kerry. I do not believe that Hillary wants Kerry to go down in flames taking CBS along with him. The danger is that if all this comes out, the dems will be shut out of the White House for a long time. Can Hillary take that risk?