Replies

"It's feasible that the originals were scanned into a OCR (Optical Character Recognition) package which would scan individual characters and substitute modern fonts."

If anyone has ever used OCR, then I'm sure they also had the occasional change of characters, also. I'm not talking about fonts, but actually changing letters such as "ln" to "h" or "in" to "m" or "cl" to "d". This was common, (at least when I used mine), and I don't see any substituted character indicating an OCR scan. Of course the new theory will be that they corrected them. *yawn* Where's my PJs?

If anyone has ever used OCR, then I'm sure they also had the occasional change of characters, also. I'm not talking about fonts, but actually changing letters such as "ln" to "h" or "in" to "m" or "cl" to "d". This was common, (at least when I used mine), and I don't see any substituted character indicating an OCR scan. Of course the new theory will be that they corrected them. *yawn* Where's my PJs?

I have used OCR through the years and hate it for the same reasons.

Regardless, if they scanned the originals into OCR to change/edit them that still makes them FRAUDS!

Where is the chain of ownership, where are the originals!

For all we know, Burkett found Killian's hand written to-do list for April and decided to flesh it out.

1. Bush needs physical
2. Bush wants transfer to Alabama
3. Call Staudt about golf on Saturday
4. Sugar coat doughnuts for breakfast tomorrow