Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spackidagoosh

O'Reilly vociferously denied Kerry ever said six-months. And he said it in the obnoxious way he says about everything that he knows nothing about.

His female minion found it (I guess on the Internet) 30 seconds later. To my knowledge he didn't mention it again.

He's a dishonest guy.


17 posted on 09/16/2004 9:52:10 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: angkor
He is dishonest......about the Ann Coulter interview, he dismissed her and always refers to her as a radical or extremist in the same breath with Michael Moore. She can trounce him in a one-on-one debate anytime!

Tonight my son made me watch O'Reilly cuz he saw yesterday's interview with Laura who thoroughly thrashed him. YET, he reads THREE letters complimentary to him and only one that supports Laura; BUT the one that supported Laura referred to himself as a right-winger.....in other words, it was a slam AGAINST Laura by intimating that her fans are all right-wingers and not fair and balanced.
My son (no right-winger) was dumbstruck! I had bet him that O'Reilly would only select letters that made HIM look fair and balanced. I figured that out by how he treated Ann Coulter and Michael Savage who always have some excellent points to make. My son had to concede that I was correct in saying that O'Reilly was arrogant and dishonest. What a fraud!!!!
35 posted on 09/16/2004 10:09:27 PM PDT by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: angkor

Some months ago, O'Reilly discussed proposed government programs to promote marriage by paying couples a yearly stipend to get and stay married. He theorized that this would be a good thing because it would raise the per capita income greatly and reduced the need for government handouts. (Yea, lets give them more money so we don't have to give them more money!) His premise was based on the fact that married households have a higher per capita income than unmarried households, so he surmized if these unmarried people got married, their income levels would rise.

Of course, Bill doesn't have the intellect for analytical reasoning to know that his theory falls apart when it is given a cursory overview. He fails to account for the fact that unmarried people may not have the ability to undertake long term commitments and hence, not get an education, a decent job and stick with the job to advance themselves. He thinks that giving money to "Ms. Crack Whore" and "Mr. Crack Head" to get married is going to turn them into neurosurgeons. Some people just are never going to be able to rise above a certain level.

I called the Radio Factor to point out the obvious flaws in this logic and I was stonewalled by the screener even though there was plenty of time left in his show.

O'Reilly just does not want to admit he is wrong!


73 posted on 09/17/2004 5:57:39 AM PDT by ArmedNReady (Truth...The Anti-Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson