Posted on 09/16/2004 9:11:52 PM PDT by SlickWillard
 |
|||
|
|
 |
||
|
Three-year-old Sophia Parlock cries while seated on the shoulders of her father, Phil Parlock, after having their Bush-Cheney sign torn up by Kerry-Edwards supporters on Thursday, Sept. 16, 2004, at the Tri-State Airport in Huntington, W.Va. Democratic vice presidential candidate John Edwards (news - web sites) made a brief stop at the airport as he concluded his two-day bus tour to locations in West Virginia and Ohio. (AP Photo/Randy Snyder) |
|||
Your assertion is absurd. There is a big difference between a woman walking in a dark alley at midnight versus being at a public airport in the middle of the day.
According two your logic the two women who were raped in that Puerto Rican day parade a few years back in New York, had it coming. Is that how you think?
I was at a Bob Dole in 1996 rally in Bloomington Illinois and Bill Clinton supporters were there. Nothing was done to them or even said to them. They had signs and nobody touched them.
Like I said this is not Columbia or the Sudan. Mr. Parlock had absolutely very right to take his children to the airport and display his freedom of speech without abatement.
This is country is not controlled by lynch mobs or vigilantes. All the stuff ended back in the day of Jesse James and Doc Holliday.
If I were Mr Parlock I would demand that the local police arrest the persons involved. Inciting Mob action and destruction of private property.
Your assertion is absurd. There is a big difference between a woman walking in a dark alley at midnight versus being at a public airport in the middle of the day.
According two your logic the two women who were raped in that Puerto Rican day parade a few years back in New York, had it coming. Is that how you think?
I was at a Bob Dole in 1996 rally in Bloomington Illinois and Bill Clinton supporters were there. Nothing was done to them or even said to them. They had signs and nobody touched them.
Like I said this is not Columbia or the Sudan. Mr. Parlock had absolutely very right to take his children to the airport and display his freedom of speech without abatement.
This is country is not controlled by lynch mobs or vigilantes. All the stuff ended back in the day of Jesse James and Doc Holliday.
If I were Mr Parlock I would demand that the local police arrest the persons involved. Inciting Mob action and destruction of private property.
Sorry,Mr. Parlock has a history of doing this.He's had the same thing happen before.Get a grip newbie.
You ARE a quack if you think he doesn't have a right to hold a sign at an airport. It didn't say anything bad about Kerry/edwards....it said only Bush/Cheney. What kind of world do you live in or WANT to live in.
Ask yourself,what are the odds of this happening,TWICE?Also,if it happened before,why would you take your children with you?
Calling me names does change or warrant your arguement
Furthermore, unless Mr. Parlock has broken the law in the past, it is total irrealvant to what happened in the airport.
Don't try to change the subject.
I did not know their was a limit on express or speech.
I am glad there are people like you, who have determined (in your little pea brain) who can say what, where, and how often.
That's stupid! What's the difference if he went to the airport with a Bush Cheney sign or went to pro-life rallies or even to pro-abortion ralies?? It's FREE SPEECH for him to hold up a sign and he has done more to show how VILE and EVIL the Democrats have become...I ADMIRE him! He stands up to enemies....he isn't cowering.
Newbie is name calling?Who'd have known.You did sign up today didn't you?Also,one can be a professional victim without breaking the law.Not changing the subject,but you are really whacked in the head to compare this to rape.
He's putting his daughter in harms way.No 3 year old should have to go through this.If he wants to do it,fine,but he shouldn't have taken his daughter with him.Of course,he wouldn't have that nice photo if he hadn't though,would he?
Ann and "Newbie",
I have to sign off for the day.Storm damage to clean up here.I will read any responses tomorrow.Have a good day.
I never suggested this. One, he could have said something
to them. If he did, I don't know what it was. Two, he could have made a complaint. Three, he could have had people with him who would stand up for them. It doesn't make sense to go into a crowd of these people as a solo protester.
Democrats believe in tyranny and don't believe in morality. This is an oversimplification, but it's increasingly true.
It explains their behavior.
Yeah...hatboy thought he'd get away with it. Never thought his reprehensible behavior would be captured on film and broadcast to the world. I hope he's ashamed and humiliated and embarassed by his horrendous actions toward a THREE YEAR OLD. Oh, the names I'd like to call this boy (and all those who participated.)
Freedom of speech, freedom of expression. He was doing absolutely nothing outside of his rights, nor was he harming anyone by holding a sign. He could go to every single RAT rally and hold a sign for the opposing candidate and could only be guilty of one thing: exercising his rights more than most Americans.
These people don't feel much shame. They have to be punished in ways that even the amoral can feel.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.