Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rather Confused - And Irritated
Insight Magazine ^ | September 16, 2004 | Paul M. Rodriguez

Posted on 09/16/2004 1:52:34 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Here are the latest DUmmie FUnnies on the subject of Dan Rather and Memogate. Their deloooosional paranoia is HILARIOUS:

It would seem that Rather is getting some good satisfaction out of making the White House squirm and twist and contort on this, so I can't imagine that he showed ALL he was going to show just last night.

Dear CBS News and Dan Rather: THANK YOU !!! Thank you for standing up to the misinformation that is being presented to the American people on a daily basis from the White House and every level of government. As I news junkie, it has been disturbing to watch the decline of journalistic integrity.

I thanked him and told him I was a typewriter repairman and that the doc's looked authentic to me.

We love you Dan, and a large group of us here are rooting for you (we're all Deaniacs....so you know how intensely we feel about cleaning up the media!) I think you are displaying genuine integrity, and it is this we admire above and beyond whatever the final validity of these documents turns out to be. We trust you, (at the moment, ha!) because of this integrity, and so much of America is aching for this right now!

With CBS acting like the only broadcast media with a spine, I'll wager the far right is afraid of what else they may have found. Keep in mind that the opposition seeks to destroy the messenger, not the message. Witness the focus on the authenticity of paper and ink, rather than the information contained.

I truly appreciate the integrity CBS News has shown in covering these recent stories regarding Mr. Bush's National Guard duty.

Here is my take on this....CBS has the originals, Rove sent the fakes to Rather, Rather knows these are fakes, but these fakes are being used to smoke out Rove. I find it strange that Rather would interview the secretary on his program for her to say she thought these documents were forgeries. Actually, Rather asked her more then once about the forgeries, then she mentions a diary. Maybe CBS has the diary. Although the secretary verified the information I think Rather is too smart to know this is not enough after all he has been investigating this for four or five years. I think Rather wants to prove that Rove sent these so called papers to him -- he is giving every opportunity to allow Rove and company to say these papers are forgeries. My impression he was emphasizing the papers were forgeries just as much as the contents. He also knows there are some documents missing -- proof now the WH has more documents available after I don't know how many times, they keep saying they turned them all over but all of a sudden more are found. When interviewing the secretary Rather was very confident (almost smug). I believe he is holding a lot back. Go Dan Rather!

the docs he's allowing to be broadcast probably are fake in an effort to trip up bushco, but I doubt that Viacom's lawyers would let him go to air with bullshit and risk the financial hit to the stockholders. There is too much money at stake to be that reckless. And Rather isn't like the cable-cabal... innuendo, insinuation and speculation passing for evidence... We don't know all there is to know, so it's too soon to be howling about fakes---Rather hasn't tipped his hand yet.

i suspect that these forgeries are, in fact, forgeries. i suspect that they were leaked by the GOP in order to create the belief that CBS is untrustworthy on not only this issue, but any others in which they have criticized the administration in the past. this all just seems way too intentional to me.

21 posted on 09/16/2004 2:34:38 PM PDT by PJ-Comix (What's the Forgery, Dan!!!???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Not a bad day's work for some folks in their jammies.

Dang, Congersman, I had to break down and wash my jammies today.

22 posted on 09/16/2004 2:56:33 PM PDT by Ole Okie (What's the new frequency, Danno?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaYankee
Just wait, coming soon we may see "RATHERGATE: THE MOVIE"

Subtitled "All the Pseudo-Reporter's Men"?

23 posted on 09/16/2004 3:00:00 PM PDT by Ole Okie (What's the new frequency, Danno?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I may be late to the party on this, but it just occurred to me how ironic it is that Rather is trying to report that Lt Bush received some pulled strings because of his privileged position, while Rather is now being retained by CBS in spite of reporting behavior that would have gotten a staff reporter fired on the spot, because Rather is considered to be privileged.

Oh, the irony.

24 posted on 09/16/2004 3:00:23 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie
Us uptown posters have TWO sets of jammies, one to wear and one to go in the wash. Plus, some of the ruder ones among us have been known to post in our underroos.

I would do that myself, but I have a stepdaughter in the house with good eyesight and a delicate digestion. There are some things a young woman should not see until she's been married. For about thirty years.

Billybob

25 posted on 09/16/2004 3:21:47 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Visit: www.ArmorforCongress.com please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I have a vague recollection of a TV shot of W at the 1988 Republican convention needling Rather about his interview with 41. Maybe this is Rathers last opportunity for payback.


26 posted on 09/16/2004 3:22:45 PM PDT by Timocrat (I Emanate on your Auras and Penumbras Mr Blackmun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Excellent. You touched all the bases.


27 posted on 09/16/2004 3:23:07 PM PDT by daviscupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Someone ought to do a new movie as a sequel:

NETWORK NEWS PART TWO - starring Dan Rather as the egotistic network newscaster

28 posted on 09/16/2004 3:25:14 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace (Michael <a href = "http://www.michaelmoore.com/" title="Miserable Failure">"Miserable Failure"</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
"Dan has simply lost his mind. "

It would be funny if it was a joke, but in all seriousness I have to agree. Dan reminds me of an old actor trying to regain his fame by giving the performance of his life, yet ends up falling very flat. Dan is a has-been in a new world.
29 posted on 09/16/2004 3:27:52 PM PDT by devane617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
that the focus should not be on him but on Bush who has failed to answer "the charges" contained in the apparently forged and fake documents

Like the old question, "Have you stopped beating your wife?" add "What about these documents that say you didn't complete your anger mangement course? It doesn't matter that the documents are forgeries, how can you control your temper without completing the course? "

30 posted on 09/16/2004 3:38:06 PM PDT by eccentric (aka baldwidow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
This guy is good. He nails Dan's frequency to the wall.

To bad Oh Really of Fox News is carrying water for Dan the distorter. My respect for O'Really has hit a new low! And my opinion of Rather and C-BS couldn't sink any lower.
31 posted on 09/16/2004 3:39:43 PM PDT by kapn kuek (Terrorism for Dummies: #7. When you hear terrorist, translate to islamic terrorist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Dan Rather


32 posted on 09/16/2004 5:14:18 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I'm no rocket scientist but from what I've read, been told and researched, Bush put in his required points for each year of service and was given an honorable discharge. Isn't that fulfilling one's commitment? According to Rather, apparently not.
33 posted on 09/16/2004 5:24:19 PM PDT by Indie (Ignorance of the truth is no excuse for stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson