http://edition.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/16/kerry.strategy.ap/index.html
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/chitribts/20040916/ts_chicagotrib/kerryaccusesbushofpassingbuckoneconomy
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/usatoday/20040916/pl_usatoday/kerryslamsbushovereconomy
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/16/politics/campaign/16kerry.html?ex=1095998400&en=c10e38fa48d0d49a&ei=5006&partner=ALTAVISTA1
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/washpost/20040916/pl_washpost/a22980_2004sep15
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/afp/20040914/pl_afp/us_vote_040914134852
http://www.iht.com/articles/538645.html
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=6233664&src=rss/ElectionCoverage§ion=news
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20040913/pl_nm/campaign_korea_north_dc_1
This person is at Harvard?
How dumb do you have to be to get into Harvard now?
Yeah but isn't he going to deliver a powerful speech to the Reserves sometime today? You know, another speech to totally demoralize our troops abroad?
The John Kerry of 1971 was of no more substance than the John Kerry of 2004. What is different today is that John Kerry is 33 years older and his family medical history is apparently catching up with him.
Don't you actually have to believe in something in order to take a strong political position?
His strongest belief seems to be that he hates GWB. That's not a position that's going to win my vote.
The editorial writer recognizes the symptoms of Kerry's disease but he chooses not to opine on the cause.
Sheesh. Even the pro-Kerry audience on the Dick Cavett show thought that he had his clock cleaned by John ONeil.