1 posted on
09/15/2004 11:39:33 PM PDT by
kattracks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
To: kattracks
I agree there shouldn't be an investigation. But the Republicans should pull up their socks and refuse Democrat demands for similar investigations on the other side for which there is far less evidence that a crime has been committed.
79 posted on
09/16/2004 6:21:37 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: kattracks; All
That's okay I guess, after all they just awarded themselves another pay raise. We wouldn't want them to HAVE TO WORK now would we?
81 posted on
09/16/2004 6:33:34 AM PDT by
areafiftyone
(Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
To: kattracks
The Congressional Republicans might learn a lesson from President Bush by staying above the fray at all times. There's nothing to be gained from stepping into the middle of this fiasco.
85 posted on
09/16/2004 7:01:34 AM PDT by
BigSkyFreeper
(Real gun control is - all shots inside the ten ring)
To: kattracks
Cowardly GOP Bigwigs. Why are they afraid of holding the liberal media accountable for fraud? They let CBS get away with this, you can be sure there will be more corruption and fraud in the future.
86 posted on
09/16/2004 7:02:53 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: kattracks
Paging the FBI. Or are forgery and fraud no longer illegal...?
92 posted on
09/16/2004 9:02:20 AM PDT by
mewzilla
To: kattracks
Girlymen republicans bite us in the arse again. Do you think the dems would refrain from having THREE committees looking into this ALONG with a "bipartisan" panel?
Republican leadership disgusts me.
94 posted on
09/16/2004 10:15:59 AM PDT by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
To: kattracks
Worry not, this is big boys playing this game and the pubs do it much better than the rats.
To: kattracks
Barton is correct. The free market will take care of CBS
To: kattracks
Cox should be censured by Congress and should resign immediately.
He swore an oath to defend the Constitution and this is a distinctly anti-Consitutional activity.
102 posted on
09/17/2004 10:29:00 AM PDT by
NCSteve
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson