Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/15/2004 11:39:33 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: kattracks

I was afraid of that. But I liked the sentiment anyway.


2 posted on 09/15/2004 11:40:23 PM PDT by lawgirl (It's not about Vietnam- it's about John Kerry's lies about Vietnam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
But fellow Republican Joe Barton (Texas) rebuffed Cox's demand, saying an investigation "hardly seems appropriate or necessary."

I'm with Barton on this.
5 posted on 09/15/2004 11:47:33 PM PDT by Jaysun (The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of your action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Let the rival press beat up on See BS. Republicans want to stay above the fray and concentrate on their various election races. Enough is being revealed now about the source(s) of these forged documents that I believe the truth will come out shortly.


7 posted on 09/15/2004 11:48:10 PM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

We don't need no estinkin' investigation. CBS is doing a fine job of sinking their own ship - and they are drowning Kerry at the same time.


8 posted on 09/15/2004 11:49:42 PM PDT by clee1 (Islam is a deadly plague; liberalism is the AIDS virus that prevents us from defending ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

It was not going to go anywhere just yet, but it has now been placed in the congressional record.


10 posted on 09/15/2004 11:50:02 PM PDT by nonkultur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"I do not personally believe these documents are legitimate, and it seems clear that the press and the two presidential campaigns are properly dealing with that issue," Barton said.

He forgot to mention the PJjournalist brigade. They are so much faster and genuine than any congressional investigation anyhow.
13 posted on 09/15/2004 11:51:11 PM PDT by Centaur (Never practice moderation to excess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

So Janet's titty deserves an investigation, but forging government documents in an effort to sway a federal election doesn't?

True, congress is not CBS' watchdog, but there's more going on here. Setting a precedent of Shock & Awe Prosecution against those who would blithely forge gov dox hoping to defame a sitting president seems to me like a good idea.

Let them walk, and lord knows what the libs will come up with in 04.


16 posted on 09/15/2004 11:53:37 PM PDT by zeppenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

So long as it isn't affecting Bush in the polls, it isn't worth the difficulties involved. I'd wait until after the elections and go after CBS with a vengence.


18 posted on 09/15/2004 11:57:02 PM PDT by flying Elvis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
so, where is the public apology from mcauliff and harkin for using these fake docs as their reason for calling the president a "liar" for three days straight?
20 posted on 09/15/2004 11:59:15 PM PDT by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

What about the FCC?


21 posted on 09/15/2004 11:59:18 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

I think we can trust at this point that the Old Media will be hastened to irrelevance sooner because of Rathergate. (Someone teach me how to make the "th" superscripted.) But this stopped being about Dan Rather a while ago. A somewhat major news agency, operating on airwaves you and I own, has attempted to throw an election for the office of President. While at war. Economic punishment isn't enough. The people who did this need to go to jail, not just retire with their reputations in tact with their elite liberal pals.


23 posted on 09/16/2004 12:03:07 AM PDT by DC Bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

24 posted on 09/16/2004 12:04:28 AM PDT by Bonaparte (and guess who sighs his lullabies, to nights that never end...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

I guess he's right, the maindream media is showing its true colors and even ignorant people can see that. Rather will go down in history as being the liberal bias slanted puppet that he is.


25 posted on 09/16/2004 12:05:03 AM PDT by garylmoore (Repeat: They made a mistake, they didn't count of George W. Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
...it seems clear that the press and the two presidential campaigns are properly dealing with that issue," Barton said.

Well, he has a point there.

It sure would be nice however to see the fear of God in the eyes of those elitist MSM people who consider themselves the 4th branch.

That would at least make them think (term used loosely for some of them) twice before promoting shenanigans which could have an effect on our country which could cause change to be felt for decades to come.

26 posted on 09/16/2004 12:05:14 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
This is probably for the best. Rather would play martyr to the hilt. The Dems would back him up, it is in their interest and a teriffic opportunity for political theater. Sen. Byrd would work up a gale force bluster. Pelosi's head would get more bug eyed than usual and Tom Harkin would belch brimstone. As for Ted Kennedy, the less speculation on a family forum, the better.

As it is, all the heels are spinning nicely in the wind. Let them continue.

28 posted on 09/16/2004 12:05:56 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
This whole scandal was obviously orchestrated by the Kerry Campaign, the DNC, or one or more Democrat Activist organizations.

Could someone please explain the legal, moral, and ethical differences between this and the Watergate investigation. Why wouldn't this warrant a congressional investigation? This was an obvious attempt to subvert and malign the President of the United States at a time of war. The fraud they attempted to perpetrate on the American people could very well undermine and change the outcome of the war in Iraq, subsequently costing the lives of service men and innocent Iraqi citizens.

To me this in not merely about the partisanship, bias, fraud and incompetence of Dan Rather and CBS, but it is also about subverting American president and subsequently our military in a time of war. In my humble opinion, this is far worse than anything Richard Nixon did, and President Nixon was humiliated and disgraced by the righteously indignant media to the point of resignation. There were hearings after hearings after hearings about Watergate. Where is the righteous indignation of the MSM today. The best we can get out of them about these forgeries is statements like "alleged" forgeries or "seemingly" forgeries, but no one is calling for congressional hearings or demanding CBS reveal its' sources.

31 posted on 09/16/2004 12:08:29 AM PDT by Arnold Zephel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

Fax# (212) 975-1998

32 posted on 09/16/2004 12:09:26 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (What's the frequency Kenneth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I agree with Barton. Look, this is the U.S. Congress we're talking about, not Vlad Putin. In America, the Congress just doesn't crack down on bad journalists, or lying sources. Freedom isn't free.

Even if you thought otherwise, though, notice that it would be a giant mistake for the Congress to do this on political grounds alone. The last thing the Republicans need is for CBS to be object of sympathy, so that the *other* news agencies who are savaging Rather so gleefully rally to his defense.

37 posted on 09/16/2004 12:19:26 AM PDT by Timm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks

It served it's purpose! The letter from Congress to CBS is what pushed them to respond tonight. I am not so sure we should have Congress get involved because of their tendancy to turn everything into grandstanding and sound bites! I would rather see the Attorney General take this one on as the legit crime it is.


41 posted on 09/16/2004 12:28:19 AM PDT by MistyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"hardly seems appropriate or necessary."

Puh-Freaking-Lease! If the Janet Jackson's Nipple and Howard Stern's are appropriate for congressional attention, why the f*** isn't a blatant fraud intended to manipulate the upcoming election?

All they need to ask is, "Who's your source,Dan?" Even the most callow americans must realize that fraudsters and liars do not warrant protection, and CBS continuing to protect them only implicates CBS.

It has been said the Republican Party is the "Stupid Party". I begin to agree. Thank goodness the Dems have proven to be just slightly more stupid this election. The question is, who will hit the learning curve first?

43 posted on 09/16/2004 12:48:13 AM PDT by pillbox_girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson