Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CWOJackson
What's so "extreme" about not wanting someone to advertise for a political candidate that you don't support on the property you own?

Because most people don't care that much. Especially if it is not effecting business.

Some people do. But since it is out of step with what the majority of people do it can be categorized as extreme.

Does not mean that it was bad, just means that it is not run of the mill. It is like the lady who repeatedly brought pork products into the company lunch room after she was asked not to. She was fired. People were screaming about that but it was their property so they were in the right. However the position is out of the norm and therefore it was a bit extreme.

BTW, she might have a case if, but only if, he allows other employees to have political tags on their car that are parked in the company lot. If it is a company policy then she has no case.

102 posted on 09/15/2004 5:43:48 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear ("Arrrg," the captain said thoughtfully. ("Lady Snuggles of the Lethal Yew"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear
"However the position is out of the norm and therefore it was a bit extreme."

LOL! Not at all. Only one person has the right to determine what is norm when it comes to displaying political advertisements...the owner. If the owner does not wish them it is the norm for his property and is not extreme in any manner whatsoever. It is his property and he determines the norm.

106 posted on 09/15/2004 5:49:22 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson