Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WSJ: Forgery Charges Could Damage CBS Credibility
Wall Street Journal ^ | September 15, 2004 | JOE FLINT and BROOKS BARNES

Posted on 09/15/2004 6:16:28 AM PDT by OESY

...CBS has dismissed calls for an internal investigation into its reporting of the story, arguing that it was thoroughly reviewed before broadcast. "I'm confident in the process of vetting that got the story on air. When we say we continue to report the story you can be sure we're being conscientious in responding to these allegations," says CBS News President Andrew Heyward. CBS may offer further evidence in support of its story as early as today.

The stakes are high for "60 Minutes," the undisputed gold standard in television news.... Its longtime producer, Don Hewitt, 81, has retired unenthusiastically, and its correspondents are aging. Mike Wallace is 86; Morley Safer is 72. Mr. Rather, who himself is 72, is lead correspondent for the "60 Minutes" Wednesday edition.

All broadcast-news executives are under siege.... Just last month cable upstart Fox News Channel beat the three broadcasters head-to-head in coverage of the Republican convention, in the few hours that the networks bothered to cover it at all. Ratings for the evening news programs continue to slide while the morning shows and newsmagazines often seem more focused on entertainment stories, true crime and corporate synergy. As Mr. Rather and CBS have been taking heat this week, NBC's "Today" has been offering three days of interviews with author Kitty Kelley about her gossipy Bush-bashing tome, "The Family."

"Network news is diminished," says Tom Rosenstiel, the director of the think tank Project for Excellence in Journalism....

..."I think CBS definitely made an error in saying there is no investigation needed because if they had done the opposite and said 'of course we're investigating,' it would have bought them time and would have at least acknowledged that certain transparencies in news organizations are becoming required," says Jay Rosen, chairman of New York University's Journalism Department.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 60minutes; abrams; abughraib; arnett; broyles; bush; cbs; clarke; cnn; dateline; fox; gartner; generalmotors; hewitt; hitlerdiaries; kittykelley; mapes; nationalguard; nbc; nyujournalism; parker; rather; rathergate; rosen; rosenstiel; safer; tailwind; thurmond; timewarner; tyndall; wallace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
Did someone write Forgeries "COULD" Damage CBS Credibility?

"That's the problem when you rely on days-old information from print journalism instead of immediately turning to FreeRepublic.com for Breaking News," said this unabashed supporter.

1 posted on 09/15/2004 6:16:33 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OESY
Forgery Charges Could Damage CBS Credibility

Ya think?!?

2 posted on 09/15/2004 6:17:42 AM PDT by jtminton (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Forgery Charges Could Damage CBS Credibility

You don't say.

3 posted on 09/15/2004 6:17:51 AM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
WSJ: Forgery Charges Could Damage CBS Credibility

Yes, they could. Sort of like an asteroid the size of Antarcica could damage the earth's ecosystems.

4 posted on 09/15/2004 6:18:35 AM PDT by Kenton ("Life is tough, and it's really tough when you're stupid" - Damon Runyon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

As far as I am concerned, they lost their credibility a very long time ago.


5 posted on 09/15/2004 6:18:49 AM PDT by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
The seeBS eye-con should be changed to this.


6 posted on 09/15/2004 6:19:15 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenton
Antarcica=Antarctica
7 posted on 09/15/2004 6:19:23 AM PDT by Kenton ("Life is tough, and it's really tough when you're stupid" - Damon Runyon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OESY
CBS Credibility

OXYMORON ALERT!

8 posted on 09/15/2004 6:20:09 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Tourette's syndrome is just a $&#$*!% excuse for poor *%$#** language skills.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY; All
Yes indeed -- the damage is already done. Bloggers ROCK!!

Here is a copyright-ready cartoon for any use that's noncommercial... emails, signs, flyers, whatever


9 posted on 09/15/2004 6:20:33 AM PDT by IPWGOP (I'm Linda Eddy, and I approved this message... 'tooning the truth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

CBS? What "credibility"?


10 posted on 09/15/2004 6:20:44 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

If I read something correctly yesterday it stated CBS viewers were up.
Strange world we live in or is it.


11 posted on 09/15/2004 6:21:12 AM PDT by snakeoil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
"That's the problem when you rely on days-old information from print journalism instead of immediately turning to FreeRepublic.com for Breaking News," said a concerned citizen identified by CBS News as a 'politican partisan.'

;-)

12 posted on 09/15/2004 6:22:28 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

"Did someone write Forgeries "COULD" Damage CBS Credibility? "


WHAT credibility??? Wonder aside from the FREEPERS who watched how many Americans actually did watch???

Other than the liberals salivating and the FREEPERS who else would watch? Could it be that this is exactly the plan from the beginning, that somebody would call the documents forgeries? Maybe the only thing that did not go according to the plan was the speed with which the "forgeries" were outed and by whom.


13 posted on 09/15/2004 6:22:38 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
But, there is NO legal penalty for journalism fraud (also known as journalistic fraud). The "profession" is self policing via the mechanism of hiring and firing.

The legal perimiter of journalism fraud are found in defamation and copyright law.

CBS is plowing precedent-setting ground here.

14 posted on 09/15/2004 6:22:48 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Well, remember when NBC did the story on how Chevy pickup gas tanks were dangerous, and it came out that NBC had been forced to use fireworks in their effort to show how easily they could explode?


15 posted on 09/15/2004 6:23:00 AM PDT by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

Er, 'political partisan.'


16 posted on 09/15/2004 6:23:34 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OESY
"When we say we continue to report the story you can be sure we're being conscientious in responding to these allegations," says CBS News President Andrew Heyward.

= we continue to report the story . . . being conscientious in repeating the allegations [against Bush]

"CBS may offer further evidence in support of its story as early as today. "

hmmmmm

17 posted on 09/15/2004 6:23:36 AM PDT by AMDG&BVMH (Proudly served in the National Guard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
The stakes are high for "60 Minutes," the undisputed gold standard in television news.... Its longtime producer, Don Hewitt, 81, has retired unenthusiastically, and its correspondents are aging. Mike Wallace is 86; Morley Safer is 72. Mr. Rather, who himself is 72, is lead correspondent for the "60 Minutes" Wednesday edition.

Wait a second. Isn't the Killian secretary "Mrs. Knox" 86? Could it be that the "source" is Mike Wallace in drag?

18 posted on 09/15/2004 6:23:51 AM PDT by Semi Civil Servant (I'm just another pajama journalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
Could damage.....?

The sad thing is that they had any credibility in the first place.

19 posted on 09/15/2004 6:23:54 AM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY
"I'm confident in the process of vetting that got the story on air.

Well, nobody else is. Perhaps some new blood is needed at CBS News, starting at the top. If so, it sounds like it would be the first new blood there since about 1970 - which perhaps not-so-coincidentally is when Kerry started making his name.

20 posted on 09/15/2004 6:24:00 AM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson