Skip to comments.
WSJ: Forgery Charges Could Damage CBS Credibility
Wall Street Journal ^
| September 15, 2004
| JOE FLINT and BROOKS BARNES
Posted on 09/15/2004 6:16:28 AM PDT by OESY
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Did someone write Forgeries "COULD" Damage CBS Credibility?
"That's the problem when you rely on days-old information from print journalism instead of immediately turning to FreeRepublic.com for Breaking News," said this unabashed supporter.
1
posted on
09/15/2004 6:16:33 AM PDT
by
OESY
To: OESY
Forgery Charges Could Damage CBS Credibility Ya think?!?
2
posted on
09/15/2004 6:17:42 AM PDT
by
jtminton
(<><)
To: OESY
Forgery Charges Could Damage CBS CredibilityYou don't say.
3
posted on
09/15/2004 6:17:51 AM PDT
by
68skylark
To: OESY
WSJ: Forgery Charges Could Damage CBS Credibility Yes, they could. Sort of like an asteroid the size of Antarcica could damage the earth's ecosystems.
4
posted on
09/15/2004 6:18:35 AM PDT
by
Kenton
("Life is tough, and it's really tough when you're stupid" - Damon Runyon)
To: OESY
As far as I am concerned, they lost their credibility a very long time ago.
5
posted on
09/15/2004 6:18:49 AM PDT
by
Piquaboy
To: OESY
The seeBS eye-con should be changed to this.
To: Kenton
Antarcica=Antarctica
7
posted on
09/15/2004 6:19:23 AM PDT
by
Kenton
("Life is tough, and it's really tough when you're stupid" - Damon Runyon)
To: OESY
CBS CredibilityOXYMORON ALERT!
8
posted on
09/15/2004 6:20:09 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Tourette's syndrome is just a $&#$*!% excuse for poor *%$#** language skills.)
To: OESY; All
Yes indeed -- the damage is already done. Bloggers ROCK!!
Here is a copyright-ready cartoon for any use that's noncommercial... emails, signs, flyers, whatever
9
posted on
09/15/2004 6:20:33 AM PDT
by
IPWGOP
(I'm Linda Eddy, and I approved this message... 'tooning the truth!)
To: OESY
10
posted on
09/15/2004 6:20:44 AM PDT
by
FreePaul
To: OESY
If I read something correctly yesterday it stated CBS viewers were up.
Strange world we live in or is it.
11
posted on
09/15/2004 6:21:12 AM PDT
by
snakeoil
To: OESY
"That's the problem when you rely on days-old information from print journalism instead of immediately turning to FreeRepublic.com for Breaking News," said a concerned citizen identified by CBS News as a 'politican partisan.' ;-)
To: OESY
"Did someone write Forgeries "COULD" Damage CBS Credibility? "
WHAT credibility??? Wonder aside from the FREEPERS who watched how many Americans actually did watch???
Other than the liberals salivating and the FREEPERS who else would watch? Could it be that this is exactly the plan from the beginning, that somebody would call the documents forgeries? Maybe the only thing that did not go according to the plan was the speed with which the "forgeries" were outed and by whom.
To: OESY
But, there is NO legal penalty for journalism fraud (also known as journalistic fraud). The "profession" is self policing via the mechanism of hiring and firing.
The legal perimiter of journalism fraud are found in defamation and copyright law.
CBS is plowing precedent-setting ground here.
14
posted on
09/15/2004 6:22:48 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: OESY
Well, remember when NBC did the story on how Chevy pickup gas tanks were dangerous, and it came out that NBC had been forced to use fireworks in their effort to show how easily they could explode?
15
posted on
09/15/2004 6:23:00 AM PDT
by
Sam Cree
(Democrats are herd animals)
To: OESY
Er, 'political partisan.'
To: OESY
"When we say we continue to report the story you can be sure we're being conscientious in responding to these allegations," says CBS News President Andrew Heyward.
= we continue to report the story . . . being conscientious in repeating the allegations [against Bush]
"CBS may offer further evidence in support of its story as early as today. "
hmmmmm
17
posted on
09/15/2004 6:23:36 AM PDT
by
AMDG&BVMH
(Proudly served in the National Guard)
To: OESY
The stakes are high for "60 Minutes," the undisputed gold standard in television news.... Its longtime producer, Don Hewitt, 81, has retired unenthusiastically, and its correspondents are aging. Mike Wallace is 86; Morley Safer is 72. Mr. Rather, who himself is 72, is lead correspondent for the "60 Minutes" Wednesday edition. Wait a second. Isn't the Killian secretary "Mrs. Knox" 86? Could it be that the "source" is Mike Wallace in drag?
To: OESY
Could damage.....?
The sad thing is that they had any credibility in the first place.
To: OESY
"I'm confident in the process of vetting that got the story on air.Well, nobody else is. Perhaps some new blood is needed at CBS News, starting at the top. If so, it sounds like it would be the first new blood there since about 1970 - which perhaps not-so-coincidentally is when Kerry started making his name.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson