Posted on 09/14/2004 8:30:33 AM PDT by cryptical
TORONTO - The University of Toronto has just played host to an important conference, entitled "The Politics of Obesity," at which scholars from various academic disciplines examined the claim that North America is facing a health crisis because of increasing weight. The consensus was that we are not: a conclusion that will only surprise those who rely on diet doctors, rather than social scientists, for information on the topic.
America loves to export health hysteria, as illustrated by the comments of U.S. drug czar John Walters, who is upset by signs that Canada is implementing a rational policy in regard to marijuana. "The kind of marijuana coming from Canada is the crack of marijuana," Walters says. "It is dangerous. It is destructive."
Referring to recent Canadian legislation that has decriminalized possession of small amounts of marijuana, our drug czar fumed that "the political leadership in Canada has been utterly unable to come to grips with this. They're talking about legalization while Rome burns."
Rome is burning, according to Walters, because the marijuana being sold today is vastly more potent than that of a generation ago - as much as 30 times more powerful. "This isn't your parents' marijuana" (i.e., the kind smoked 20 years ago by a large proportion of the government officials who now prosecute the drug war), Walters warns our ever-vulnerable children.
Even by the abysmally low standards of truthfulness employed by public health officials in regard to drugs in general, and marijuana in particular, these statements are remarkable for their dishonesty. The claim that today's marijuana is thirty times more powerful than the "schwag" once enjoyed by our current leaders is true only in the Clintonian sense that it isn't 100 percent false.
This figure was produced by comparing the most powerful marijuana now available - which, because it is both extremely rare and extremely expensive, will only be smoked by a tiny handful of marijuana users - with the lowest grade pot seized by police agencies 30 years ago: weed far weaker than that smoked by the average bell-bottomed Led Zeppelin fan.
The truth is that the average THC content of marijuana today is about 4.5 percent, as compared to about 3 percent a generation ago (THC, or tetrahydrocannabinol, is the hallucinatory chemical that is the principal and most active ingredient in marijuana). Thus the claim that today's marijuana is 30 times stronger than the product Bill Clinton claims not to have inhaled exaggerates the situation by approximately 1,500 percent.
Even this understates the dishonesty of our drug warriors. There is no evidence that stronger marijuana leads those who use the drug to ingest more THC, or that it increases the very modest health risks associated with its use (indeed, the biggest health risk - smoke inhalation - is lessened by stronger marijuana, because it requires less smoking to produce the same effect).
Last week, the academic year got off to an all-too familiar start when Samantha Spady, a 19-year-old Colorado State sophomore, was found dead in the lounge of a campus fraternity. She apparently drank herself to death - something that almost anyone can do with a bottle of vodka, and a fate that will befall many other college students before the year is done.
By contrast, an "overdose" of the "crack of marijuana" - the extremely rare and expensive stuff smoked by almost no one - will cause those who smoke it to fall asleep, and wake up a few hours later with a headache.
Tens of thousands of Americans are in prison today because we treat a drug that has never killed anyone as if it were far more dangerous than a drug that kills tens of thousands of Americans every year. Truth: the anti-drug-war drug.
Paul Campos is a professor of law at the University of Colorado. He can be reached at paul.campos@colorado.edu.
Here we go... we'll see the usual posting from the "two wrongs don't make a right" morality crowd versus the "don't tell me what's right and wrong" libertarian crowd. But let's go, I do enjoy the debate.
Consider that Asa Hutchinson used to be Drug Czar. Now he runs "border security."
No matter what you think of the Drug War, you have to believe that people like Asa Hutchinson are from a species of poisonously treasonous evil people.
John Walters will blandly look you right in the eye and lie. About anything. Pure EVIL.
What I want to know is why we insist on calling our government officials "czars." Drug czar, intelligence czar... Since when is "czar" a favorable or even neutral term? Why is our government openly using a term that is synonomous with "tyrant?"
It's a small point, but I have to wonder whether it indicates the wrong mindset among the people we've hired to govern.
Correlation does not prove causation.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12533121&dopt=Abstract
In other words if I find out all the hoopla is overblown, I'm going to tend to disbelieve other warnings about other illegal and legal drugs. Similarly, if Dan Rather tells me a lie, I'm going to disbelieve other things he says too.
I think it's part of "the buck stops here" syndrome. In the face of an ever growing federal bureaucracy, people want easy answers and someone to blame when things go wrong.
The price of drugs continues to decline. The quality increases. A six pack of beer is more expensive.
Thanks government.
I'll bet all those young cannabis users tried tabacco first, then moved on.
If we're going to ban drugs, let's start with the original sin that leads to all the others ...
When are these people going to wake up to the fact that millions of people have actually smoked pot and they know for a pure fact that it's not a "killer drug"?
This is like saying 100% of heroin users ingested a carbonated soft drink within 3 months of using - 7Up "experimenters" beware of danger!
Hyperbole - the Un-Argument.
I see more as an MSM to pigeon hole FR as drug legalization wackos.
This happens every time some good PR goes to FR.
(BTW oreily has also officially jumped the shark, recent commecial has him attacking "rightwing radio".)
Milk?
If Vancouver B.C. is a shining example of a rational drug policy, then count me with the irrational. I was looking around the popular section of downtown looking for a restaurant and had 6 people try to sell me dope in less than 30 min.
You don't really believe that bunk, do you???
Then shouldn't it be the "drug whipping boy" or the "intelligence scapegoat?" Czars historically are NOT accountable to the people...
Well if they put it on the menu, they'd put the street entrepreneurs out of business.
Our government likes authoritarian labels. They invoke fear and hopefully obedience in the serfs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.