http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-09-09bushdocs.pdf
Qwinn
Okay, here's a real link.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-09-09bushdocs.pdf
Qwinn
It seems that CBS was marking up their copies of the memo before scanning it for release. Ditto for the half-assed "redacting" of W's address -- it's poorly blacked out on the CBS copy, but not blacked out at all on the USA Today copy.
The same "underlined" memo also had odd discrepancies in the "initials" or whatever they are on the lower right corner of the page (the CBS copy they look like they say something like "Berf"). However, they appear to be entirely different on the CBS copy of the memo as opposed to the USA Today copy of the same memo.
Okay, if this is common knowledge already and Freepers are all aware of it, let me know so I can feel properly silly for finding a thread. I would just think by now that this would've hit a blog somewhere if it were true (beyond my posting it on the Charlie Rose boards and in the Comments section of a post at One Hand Clapping)
Qwinn
So far the score is Bloggers 137, Dan Rather 0.....
Great minds think alike!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1214348/posts?page=132#132
The perfectly centered address of three lines of different lengths all are centered with each other. And the one that misses a line, has two lines instead of three, proves that these memos didn't have preprinted addresses already on them.
All of these addresses which we can now safely say weren't pre-printed, are in the same position relative to the text of the rest of the memo.
Is that what you meant?
BUMP