Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/13/2004 9:35:32 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Sir Gawain; Joe Hadenuf; Cap'n Crunch

Brilliant detective work!


68 posted on 09/13/2004 11:16:11 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain

Also, I recall one memo uses the acronym NLT, but spells it out first, so it reads "not later than (NLT)"

Why would you use an acronym if you are going to use the longhand version as well?

Doesn't make sense or is some peculiarlity of the military?

It looks to me as if the forger looked up the acronym in some lexicon and pasted it along with it's explanation, by mistake.


71 posted on 09/13/2004 11:21:38 PM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain

You might also want to look at this
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-09-09bushdocs.pdf
This is a link to the fake bush docs with the two new one... look at the first one and you will see it notes two offices Bush & Bath ... now look and the following on page ten
http://www.usatoday.com/news/bushdocs/11-4_2004_Personnel_File.pdf

It has it list the flight status suspension for Bush on Aug 1… and just under is a second officer flight status suspension on Sept 1 that second officer name is redacted (blackout) … however on the Kerry site there is the same paper but without the name being redacted (blackout)… and that name is Bath… question is how did the Kerry camp get an un redacted copy and did the forger uses it to come up with the name Bath and I would be curious to see if this Bath name is someone that Killian would have is a memo ant the same time as Bush

Finally just Fyi look at page ten of the following to get and idea of the Al. posting
http://www.usatoday.com/news/bushdocs/6-Reassignments_Spilt_Training.pdf


76 posted on 09/13/2004 11:32:19 PM PDT by tophat9000 ("Blackrock Bob" (aka DAN RATHER)....is in full denial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain

Great!


78 posted on 09/13/2004 11:33:41 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain

Campanini (and I can't remember his rank), who appeared on Fox News last week, raised this question about OETR. He said that abbreviation was wrong, that it was OER.


91 posted on 09/14/2004 2:48:57 AM PDT by mass55th (It's the superscript, stupid!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain

Things that make you want to go "Hhhhhhhhhhhmmmmmmmnnnnnn."


93 posted on 09/14/2004 3:56:44 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but Kerry's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain

BUMP!


107 posted on 09/14/2004 8:41:49 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: visualops

ping


113 posted on 09/14/2004 9:36:07 AM PDT by visualops (Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
I"m loving this!!! (from the link provided)

"""I’m an active duty USAF Lt Col with 19 years in and wanted to add that the OETR/OER/OPR flap is likely just another nail in Dan Rather’s coffin.

To clarify:
OER (Officer Effectiveness Report...AF Form 707B--Company Grade Officers) was used to describe officer reports until 1988 (my last OER was dated May 88)

The acronym OPR (Officer Performance Report, still AF Form 707B--Company Grade Officer) replaced the OER in 1988.

Training reports (AF Form 475 since 1983, at least) are called Education/Training Reports and are used for either officers or enlisted personnel.

There is no Officer Effectiveness Training Report (OETR) currently nor can I find any evidence that there ever has been. It’s quite likely that whoever concocted this document simply made the erroneous assumption that an Education/Training Report (E/TR or ETR) would have both an officer and enlisted version.

Not a bad assumption since performance reports are different for officers and enlisted. It’s just that training reports aren’t! We all get the same form. And, FWIW, we don’t refer to training reports as “ETR"s...believe it or not, we just call them training reports (one of the few exceptions to the military rule to shorten everything). Whoever did this just showed they don’t know the USAF. I won’t even bother with “memo for file”...WTF? It’s Memo For Record!!!!""

114 posted on 09/14/2004 9:49:57 AM PDT by YaYa123 (@ SNAFUFTF = SNAFU(For The Forger).com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
Does anyone not think that the forger could have easily used a vintage typewriter, like those used for real 1970's memos, and a few copies of legitimate AF memos to produce something that was indistinguishable from the real thing? The question is why didn't he/she? Why fake a document that is so obviously fake, when to do it right would have taken very little extra time and effort?

Hatred of Bush, arrogance of the media and perceived stupidity of the Bush campaign and general public, lust to get Bush fast tracking the memos without scrutiny? Bullbutter. These people are not stupid, nor are they fools, nor are they incompetent.

I believe that the fakes were meant to be discovered and create controversy. Any theory as to the source(s), in my opinion, has to take into consideration this undeniable truth. You connect the dots.

Myself, I think it very reasonable that Billary & Co. produced the docs with the knowledge and willing collusion of CBS to out them, knowing ti will be blamed on the Kerry campaign. Dan Rather? Maybe he's ready for retirement anyway.

Very probably, again we are just being led around by the rings in our noses, lapping up the duck soup and implementing the plan.

116 posted on 09/14/2004 10:52:08 AM PDT by William Terrell (Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain

BUMTP...


120 posted on 09/14/2004 11:30:46 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain

Is this a bad ass post or what? Very cool.


129 posted on 09/14/2004 9:59:30 PM PDT by LincolnLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sir Gawain
More OER vs OETR discussion (sorry if posted elsewhere already) here .
130 posted on 09/14/2004 10:01:48 PM PDT by LincolnLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson